Schematism and Free Play: The Imagination’s Formal Power as a Unifying Feature in Kant’s Doctrine of the Faculties

Literaturhinweise

Butts, R.E. (1993), “Kant’s Schemata as Semantical Rules”, in Historical Pragmatics, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 155, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 67- 78.

Deleuze, G. (1984), Kant’s Critical Philosophy, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Gibbons, S. (1994), Kant’s Theory of Imagination: Bridging the Gaps in Judgment and Experience, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Ginsborg, H. (1997), “Lawfulness Without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding”, Philosophical Topics, no. 25:1, pp. 37-81.

Guyer, P. (2005), “The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited”, in Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 77- 109.

Kant, I. (2000), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer & Allen Wood, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Kant, I. (2008), Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, ed. Paul Guyer, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Makkreel, R. (1990), Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Ostaric, L. (2017), “The Free Harmony of the Faculties and the Primacy of Imagination in Kant’s Aesthetic Judgment”, European Journal of Philosophy, no. 25:4, pp. 1376- 1410.

Schaper, E. (1964), “Kant’s Schematism Reconsidered”, The Review of Metaphysics, no. 18:2, pp. 267-292.