Del miqdaš ‘adam de Qumran al templo de luz ismailí (haykal nurani)

Laura Navajas Espinal

doi:10.5209/ILUR.53849

Del miqdaš ‘adam de Qumran al templo de luz ismailí (haykal nurani)

Laura Navajas Espinal Investigadora independiente (España).

Abstract

El objetivo de este artículo es presentar la concepción de templo de Qumrán (templo escatológico y miqdaš ’adam) como un estadio intermedio entre la visión del Templo en la escatología judía y la interiorización ismailí del “templo de luz”, todo ello en el marco de la concepción de templo como Jardín del Edén basada en la “memoria alternativa” (Elior 2014) suministrada por las tradiciones sacerdotales parabíblicas.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

##submission.viewcitations##

Riferimenti bibliografici

P. Alexander, The Mystical Texts. Library of Second Temple Studies 61. London, 2006.

J.M. Allegro (ed.), Qumran Cave 4, I. Oxford, 1968.

M. A. Amir-Moezzi, Le Guide divin dans le Shî’isme originel: Aux sources de l’èsotérisme en Islam, Paris, 1992.

M. Bernstein “Interpretation of Scriptures” in J.C: VanderKam and L. Schiffman, (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls . New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, 376-383.

G.J. Brooke, “Miqdash Adam, Eden, and the Qumran Community”, in B. Ego, A. Lange and P. Pilhofer (eds.), Gemeinde onhen Tempel/Community without Temple: Zur Substituierung und Transformation des Jerusalemer Tempels und seines Kults im Alten Testament, antiken Judentum und frühen Christentum. Tübingen, 1994, pp. 285-301.

G.J. Brooke, “The Ten Temples in the Dead Sea Scrolls”, paper presented at the British New Testament Conferece, NT & Second Temple Judaism Seminar, June 2003.

G.J. Brooke (ed.), Temple Scroll Studies. Sheffield, 1989.

G.J. Brooke, “The Temple Scroll: A Law Unto Itself? “ in J. Clarke and Co., Essays on the Place of the Law in Israel and Early Christianity. Cambridge, 1988, pp. 34-43.

G.J. Brooke, Exegesis at Qumran, 4Qflorilegium in Its Jewish Context. Sheffield, 1985.

M. Broshi, “Visionary Architecture and Town Planning in the Dead Sea Scrolls”, in D. Dimant and L. Schiffman (eds.), Time to Prepare the Way in the Wilderness: Papers on the Qumran Scrolls. Leiden, 1981.

M. Broshi, “The Gigantic Dimensions of the Visionary Temple in the Temple Scroll”, Biblical Archaeology Review 13 (1987), pp. 36-37.

M. Broshi, The Damascus Document Reconsidered, Jerusalem, 1992.

H. Corbin, Tiempo cíclico y gnosis ismailí Madrid, 2003 (a).

H. Corbin, Templo y Contemplación: Ensayos sobre el Islam iranio. Madrid, 2003 (b).

T. Cheetham, “Within This Darkness: Incarnation, Theophany and the Primordial Revelation”, Esoterica: The Journal for Esoteric Studies 4 (2001): pp. 61-95.

T. Cheetham, Green Man, Earth Angel: The Prophetic Tradition and the Battle for the Soul of the World. Albany, 2004.

J.R. Davila, “Melchizedek , the ‘youth’ and Jesus”, in Idem (ed.) The Dead Sea Scrolls as background to postbiblical Judaism and Early Christianism, Leiden, 2003, pp. 248-274

J. R. Davila, “Exploring the Mystical Background of the Dead Sea Scrolls” in J.

J. Collins and T. H. Lim (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Oxford, 2010, pp. 442-443.

A. DeConick, “What is Early Jewish and Christian Mysticism?”, in DeConick, A. (ed), Paradise Now: Essays on Early Jewish and Christian Mysticism, Atlanta, 2006, pp. 1-24.

M. Delcor, “Melchizedek , from Genesis to the Qumran texts and the Epistle to the Hebrews”, Journal for the Study of Judaism 2 (1971), pp. 115-135.

D. Dimant, “4QFlorilegium and the Idea of the Community as a Temple” in A. Caquot, M. Hadas-Lebel and J.Riaud (eds.), Hellenica et Judaica: Hommage à Valentin Nikiprowetzkty, Leuven-Paris, 1986, pp. 165-189.

D. Dimant, “Noah in Early Jewish Literature”, in Stone, M.E. and Bergren, T.A. (eds.), Biblical Figures Outside the Bible, Harrisburg, PA, 1988, pp. 125-6.

D. Dimant, “The Vocabulary of the Qumran Sectarian Texts”, in Mohr Siebeck (ed.), History, Ideology and Bible Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Collected Studies, Tübingen, 2014, pp. 269-289.

L. DiTommaso, The Dead Sea New Jerusalem Text: Contents and Contexts, Tübingen, 2005

R. Elior, “Enoch you have chosen from amoung human beings” (hebrew), in: R. Elior & P. Schäfer (eds.), On creativity in Jewish Thought, Fetschrift for Joseph Dan, Tübingen, 2005, pp. 15-64.

R. Elior, “The Garden of Eden is the Holy of Holies and the Dwelling of the Lord” Studies in Jewish Spirituality 24 (2014), pp. 63-118.

R. Elior, The three temples: On the Emergence of Jewish Mysticism (Trans. David Louvish), Oxford, 2004.

M. Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel, Oxford, 1985.

C. Fletcher-Louis, “ On Angels, Men and Priests (Ben Sira, the Qumran Sabbath Songs and the Yom Kippur Avodah”, 2015 (This is a prepublication copy of a paper given at the January 2015 Conference in Zurich: “Gottesdienst und Engel”).

C. Fletcher-Louis, All the Glory of Adam: Liturgical Anthropology in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Leiden, 2002

D. Flusser, “2 Notes on the Midrash on 2 Sam vii”, IBJ 9 (1959), pp. 96-109.

J. Frey, “The New Jerusalem Text in its Historical and Traditio-Historical Context” in L.H.Schiffman et al. (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls Fifty Years after their Discovery, Jerusalem, 2000, pp. 800-16.

S. Fujita, The Temple Theology of the Qumran Sect and the book of Ezekiel: Their Relationship to Jewish Literature of the Last two centuries b.C., PhD Dissertation, Princeton, 1970.

F. García Martínez, “Sources et composition du Rouleau du Temple”, Henoch 13 (1991), pp. 219-232.

F. García Martínez, “The Interpretation of the Torah of Ezekiel in the Texts from Qumran” in his: Qumranica Minora II: Thematic Studies on the Dead Sea Scrolls, STDJ 64, Brill, Leiden, 2007, pp. 1-12.

F. García Martínez, “The New Jerusalem and the Future Temple of the Manuscripts from Qumran”, in STDJ (ed.), Qumran and Apocalyptic: Studies on the Aramaic Texts from Qumran, Leiden, 1992, pp. 180-213.

F. García Martínez, “The Temple Scroll and the New Jerusalem”, in P.W.Flint and J.C.VanderKam (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls after Fifty Years: A Comprehensive Assessment, Leiden, 1999, pp. 2:431-60.

F. García Martínez, “La ‘Nueva Jerusalén’ y el Templo futuro en los MSS de Qumrán”, in D. Muñoz León (ed.), Salvación en la Palabra: Targum- Derash- Berith: en memoria del profesor Alejandro Díez Macho, Madrid, 1986, pp. 563-90

F. García Martínez, F., “Sources et composition du Rouleau du Temple”, Henoch 13 (1991), pp. 219-232.

F. García Martínez, “Temple Scroll”, in L.H. Schiffman and J.C. VanderKam (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls, New York 2000, p. 929.

B. Gärtner, The Temple and the Community in Qumran and the New Testament, Cambridge, 1965.

L. Gaston, No Stone on Another: Studies in the Significance of the Fall of Jerusalem in the Synoptic Gospels, Leiden, 1970.

L. Grabbe, Priests, Prophets, Diviners, Sages: A Socio-Historical Study of Religious Specialists in Ancient Israel, Valley Forge PA, 1995

I. Gruenwald, From Apocalypticism to Gnosticism: Studies in Apocalypticism, Merkabah, Mysticism and Gnosticism, Frankfurt, 1988.

J. Hayward, The Jewish temple: A non-biblical sourcebook, London, 1996.

P. Heger, Challenges to Conventional Opinions on Qumran and Enoch Issues, Leiden, 2011.

R. Hendel, “Other Edens” in D. Schloen (ed.), Exploring the Longue Durée: Essays in Honor of Lawrence F.Stager, Winona Lake, IN, 2008, pp. 185-189.

F. Horton, The Melchizedek tradition: A critical examination of the sources to the fifth century A.D and in the Epistle to the Hebrews, Cambridge, 1976.

V.A. Hurowitz, I Have Built you an Exalted House-Temple Building in the Bible in Light of Mesopotamian and Northwest Semitic Writings, Sheffield, 1992.

P.A. Jassen, Mediating the Divine: Prophecy and Revelation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Second Temple Judaism, Leiden, 2007.

O. Keel, La iconografía del Antiguo Oriente y del Antiguo Testamento, Madrid, 2007.

J. Licht, “An Ideal Town Plan from Qumran: The Description of the New Jerusalem”, IEJ 29, (1979), pp. 45-59.

J. Maier, “Temple”, in L. Schiffman and JC. VanderKam (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls, New York, 2000, p. 926.

C. Martone, “The Enochic Tradition and the Diversity of Second Temple Judaism”, Henoch 30/1 (2008), pp. 51-55.

C. Martone, “Authority and Text in the Temple Scroll”, Henoch 36/1 (2014), pp. 21-35.

L. Mazor, “The reciprocal link between Garden of Eden and sanctuary” (Hebrew), Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies Annual (Hebrew) 13 (2002), pp. 5-42.

J.T. Milik, J.T. & M. Black, The Books of Enoch: Aramaic fragments of Qumran Cave 4, Oxford, 1976.

C.R.A. Morray Jones, “The Temple Within. The Embodied Divine Image and its Worship in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Early Jewish and Christian Sources” SBLSP (1998), pp. 400-431.

C.R.A. Morray Jone, “Transformational Mysticism in the Apocalyptic Merkabah Tradition” TJS 43 (1992), pp. 1-31.

C.R.A. Morray-Jones and C. Rowland, The Mystery of God: Early Jewish Mysticism and the New Testament, Leiden, 2009.

H. Najman, “Angels at Sinai: Exegesis, Theology, and Interpretative Authority”, Dead Sea Discoveries 7 (2000), pp. 313-33.

J.H. Newman, “Priestly Prophets at Qumran: Summoning Sinai through the Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice” in G. J. Brooke, H. Najman, and L. T. Stuckenbruck (eds.), The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity, Leiden, 2008, pp. 29-72.

D. Peters, Noah Traditions in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Conversations and Controversies in Antiquity, Atlanta, 2008.

É. Puech, “À propos de la Jérusalem Nouvelle d’après les manuscrits de la mer Morte”, Semitica 43-44 (1995), pp. 87-102.

E. Qimron, The Temple Scroll. A Critical Edition with Extensive Reconstruction,, Beer-Sheva-Jerusalem, 1996.

A.Y. Reed, Fallen angels and the history of Judaism and Christianity: The reception of Enochic literature, New York, 2007.

E.A.E. Reymond, The Mythical Origin of the Egyptian Temple, Manchester/New York, 1969

L.H. Schiffman, “Miqsat Ma’ase Ha-Torah and the Temple Scroll”, Revue de Qumran 14/55 (1990), pp. 435-457.

W. Schniedewind, The Word of God in Transition: From Prophet to Exegete in the Second Temple Period, Sheffield, 1995.

J. Schwartz “Jubilees, Bethel and the Temple of Jacob”, Hebrew Union College Annual 65 (1985), pp. 63-85.

M. Stone, “Levi, Aramaic”, in VanderKam and Schiffman (eds), Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000 pp. 486-88.

J. Strugnell, The Angelic Liturgy at Qumran: 4QSerek Shirot ‘Olat Hashshabat, Leiden, 1960

C. Sulzbach, “Of Temples on Earth, in Heaven, and In-Between”, in I.H. Henderson and G.S. Oegema (eds.), The Changing Face of Judaism, Christianity and Other Greco-Roman Religion in Antiquity. Gütersloh, 2006, pp. 166-183.

D.D. Swanson, The Temple Scroll and the Bible: The Methodology of 11QT, Leiden, 1995.

S. Thomas, The “Mysteries” of Qumran: Mystery, Secrecy, and Esotericism in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Atlanta, 2009.

E. Tigchelaar, “The Imaginal Context and the Visionary of the Aramaic New Jerusalem”, in A. Hillhorst et al. (eds.), Flores Florentino; Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Early Jewish Studies in Honour of Florentino García Martínez. JSJSup 122. Leiden, 2007, pp. 257-70.

E. Tigchelaar, “ The Character of the City and the Temple of the Aramaic New Jerusalem”, in T. Nicklas, J. Verheyden, and E.M.M. Eynikel (eds.), Other worlds and their relation to this world : Early Jewish and Ancient Christian Traditions, Leiden , Boston, 2010. pp. 117-131.

J. van Ruiten, “Visions of the Temple in the Book of Jubilees”, in: B. Ego et al. (eds.), Gemeinde ohne Temple/Community without temple: Zur Substituierung und Tansformation des Jerusalemer Tempels und seines Kults im Alten Testament, antiken Judentum und frühen Christentum, Tübingen, 1999a, pp. 215-228.

J. van Ruiten, “Eden and the Temple: The Rewriting of Genesis 2:4-3:24 in the Book of Jubilees”, in: G. P. Luttikhuzen (ed.), Paradise interpreted: Representations of biblical Paradise in Judaism and Christianity, Leiden, 1999b, pp. 63-81.

J.C. VanderKam, J.C. Enoch: A Man for all Generations, Columbia, 1995.

J.C. VanderKam, J.C., “The Birth of Noah” in Kapera, Z.J. (ed), Intertestamental Essay in Honor of Jösef Tadeusz Milik. Cracovia, 1992, pp. 213-237.

M. Weinweld, “Sabbath, Temple Building and the Enthronement of the Lord” (Hebrew) Beth Mikra 22 (1977), pp. 188-193.

M. Wheeler, Moses in the Qur’an and Islamic Exegesis.London, 2002.

M.O. Wise, “4QFlorilegium and the Temple of Adam”, Revue de Qumran 15 (1991), pp. 103-132.

M.O. Wise, A Critical Study of the Temple Scroll from Qumran Cave 11, Chicago, 1990.

E. Wolfson, “Mysticism and the Poetic-Liturgical Compositions from Qumran. A Response to Bilhah Nitzan”, Jewish Quarterly Review 85 (1994), pp. 185-20.

E. Wolfson, “The Seven Mysteries of Knowledge: Qumran Esotericism Recovered” in Najman, H. and Newman, J.H. (eds.), The Idea of Biblical Interpretation:

Essays in Honor of James L. Kugel, Leiden, 2003, pp. 173-213.

Y. Yadin, The Temple Scroll Vols. 1-3 and Supplement, Jerusalem, 1983.

Y. Yadin, “A Midrash on 2 Sam vii and Ps. i-ii (4QFlorilegium)”, Israel Exploration Journal, 9/2 (1959), pp. 95-98.

Y. Yadin, The Temple Scroll. The Hidden Law of the Dead Sea Sect, London, 1985.

##submission.format##

PDF (Español (España))

##submission.crossmark##

##submission.metrics##

Pubblicato

2016-10-13

Come citare

Navajas Espinal L. (2016). Del miqdaš ‘adam de Qumran al templo de luz ismailí (haykal nurani). ’Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones, 21, 129-147. https://doi.org/10.5209/ILUR.53849

ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver

Scarica citazione

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Fascicolo

V. 21 (2016)

Sezione

Artículos

Licenza

La revista 'Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones, para fomentar el intercambio global del conocimiento, facilita el acceso sin restricciones a sus contenidos desde el momento de su publicación en la presente edición electrónica, y por eso es una revista de acceso abierto. Los originales publicados en esta revista son propiedad de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid y es obligatorio citar su procedencia en cualquier reproducción total o parcial. Todos los contenidos se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario. Puede consultar la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia.