Claves políticas y jurídicas de la adopción en época republicana y augustea

Santiago Castán

doi:10.5209/geri.68584

Political and Legal Keys to Adoption in Republican and Augustan Age

Santiago Castán Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/geri.68584

Keywords: Adoptio, Adrogatio, Caesar, Testamentary adoption, Augustus, Political succession in the Principate

Abstract

Adoption, an old institution of family law and inheritance, was a regular instrument used for political purposes by the republican nobility and the first emperors. The article focuses on the political keys of this institute as a new mechanism in politics of those times, studying specifically the testamentary adoption of Cayo Octavio, and those made later by him in order to ensure the political succession of the Principate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

View citations

References

Albanese, B. (1979): Le persone nel diritto privato romano, Palermo.

Amarelli, F. (2010): Itinera ad Principatum. Vicende del potere degli imperatori romani. Lezioni, Napoli.

Beltrán Lloris, F. (2015): “Et te, o puer (...), qui omnia nomini debes. ¿Por qué llamar Octaviano al joven César?”, [en] J. López Vilar (ed.), Tarraco Biennal. Actes: 2on Congrés Internacional d’Arqueologia i Món Antic: August i les províncies occidentals, 2000 aniversari de la mort d’August (Tarragona, 26-29 de noviembre de 2014), Tarragona, 45-49.

Bruhns, H. (1990): “Parenté et alliances politiques à la fin de la République romaine”, [en] Parenté et stratégies familiales dans l’Antiquité romaine. Actes de la table ronde des 2-4 octobre 1986 (Paris, Maison des sciences de l’homme), (=Publications de l’École française de Rome 129), Roma, 571-594.

Calzada, A. (1995): La aceptación de la herencia en el Derecho Romano. Aditio nuda voluntate, Zaragoza.

Castán Pérez-Gómez, S. (2006): “Condicio iuris” y “Tacita condicio”. Las condiciones implícitas en el Derecho privado romano (=Ciencias jurídicas y sociales 26), Madrid.

Castán Pérez-Gómez, S. (2013): “Reflexiones sobre el origen de las sucesiones en Roma. El testamentum calatis comitiis y su relación con la sucesión intestada”, RIDROM. Revista Internacional de Derecho Romano 11, 205-287.

Ciaceri, E. (1934): Tiberio successore di Augusto, Milano–Genova–Roma–Napoli.

Clemente, G. (1990): “La politica romana nell’età dell’imperialismo”, [en] A. Schiavone – A. Momigliano (eds.), Storia di Roma, Torino, vol. II.1, 235-266.

Cohen, B. (1975): “La notion d’«ordo» dans la Rome Antique”, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 2, 259-282 ( https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1975.3319).

Corbier, M. (1990): “Les comportements familiaux de l’aristocratie romaine (IIe siècle av. J.-C.-IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.)”, [en] Parenté et stratégies familiales dans l’Antiquité romaine. Actes de la table ronde des 2-4 octobre 1986 (Paris, Maison des sciences de l’homme), (=Publications de l’École française de Rome 129), Roma, 225-249 (https://doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1987.283453).

Corbier, M. (1991): “Divorce and Adoption as Roman Familial Strategies”, [en] B. Rawson (ed.), Marriage, Divorce and Children in Ancient Rome, Canberra–New York–Oxford, 47-78.

Corbier, M. (2004): “Male power and legitimacy through women: the domus Augusta under the Julio-Claudians”, [en] R. Hawley – B. Levick (eds.), Women in Antiquity. New assessments (London–New York 1995, first published), Taylor & Francis e-Library, 178-193 (https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428559).

Crook, J. (1967): Law and Life of Rome, New York.

De Martino, F. (1974²): Storia della costituzione romana, vol. IV.1, Napoli.

De Ruggiero, E. (1895): “Adoptio”, [en] E. De Ruggiero (dir.), Dizionario epigrafico di antichità romane, Roma, vol. I, 93-97.

Dixon, S. (1985): “The marriage alliance in the Roman elite”, Journal of Family History 10, 353-378 (https://doi.org/10.1177/036319908501000402).

Eck, W. (2007²): The Age of Augustus, Oxford.

Ernout, A. – Meillet, A. (2001): Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Histoire des mots, Paris.

Fayer, C. (1994): La familia romana. Aspetti giuridici ed antiquari. Parte prima (=“L’Erma” di Bretschneider. Problemi e ricerche di storia antica 16), Roma.

Gaudemet, J. (1988): “Formes et fonctions de l’adoption dans le monde Antique”, [en] M. J. Peláez (ed.), Orlandis 70: Estudios de derecho privado y penal romano, feudal y burgués, Barcelona, 275-300.

Goody, J. (1969): “Adoption in Cross-Cultural Perspective”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 11/1, 55-78 (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500005156).

Gruen, E. S. (1974): The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.

Gruen, E. S. (2005): “Augustus and the Making of the Principate”, [en] K. Galinsky (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the Age of Augustus, Cambridge, 33-52 (https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521807964.003).

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2019): La cultura política de la República romana. Un debate historiográfico internacional (=Libera Res Publica 1), Zaragoza.

Hurlet, F. (1997): Les collègues du prince sous Auguste et Tibère. De la légalité républicaine à la légitimité dynastique (=Publications de l’École française de Rome 227), Roma.

Jones, A. H. M. (1970): Augustus, London.

Jonquieres, C. (2004): “La Crise de 19 a. C. et ses conséquences”, Gerión 22/1, 273-290.

Kaser, M. (1971²): Das Römische Privatrecht, vol. 1, München.

Konrad, C. F. (1996): “Notes on Roman Also-Rans”, [en] J. Linderski (ed.), Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, Stuttgart, 104-143.

Kunst, C. (2005): Römische Adoption. Zur Strategie einer Familienorganisation (=Frankfurter althistorische Beiträge 10), Hennef.

Lemosse, M. (1953): “L’adoption d’Octave et ses rapports avec les regles traditionnelles du droit civil”, [en] Studi in memoria di Emilio Albertario, Milano, vol. I, 371-395.

Lindsay, H. (2005): “Adoption and its function in cross-cultural context”, [en] S. Dixon (ed.), Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World, London–New York, 190-204.

Lindsay, H. (2009): Adoption in the Roman World, Cambridge (https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657399).

Lo Cascio, E. (1985): “Arrichimento e ascesa sociale: quesiti a mo’ di introduzione”, Index 13, 1-4.

Millar, F. (1984): “The Political Character of the Classical Roman Republic, 200-151 B.C.”, Journal of Roman Studies 74, 1-19 (https://doi.org/10.2307/299003).

Miquel, J. (1969): El problema de la sucesión de Augusto (=Cuadernos Taurus 87), Madrid.

Mommsen, Th. (1869): “Zur Lebensgeschichte des Jüngeren Plinius”, Hermes 3, 31-139.

Mommsen, Th. (1896): Le droit public romain, vol. V, Paris.

Moreau, Ph. (2005): “La domus Augusta et les formations de parenté à Rome”, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 16, 7-23 (https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2005.877).

Morley, N. (2004): Theories, Models and Concepts in Ancient History, London–New York.

Narducci, E. (1989): Modelli etici e società. Un’idea di Cicerone (=Biblioteca di Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 7), Pisa.

Palma, A. (1988): “Note in tema di adozione testamentaria e di «condicio nominis ferendi»”, [en] Estudios en homenaje al profesor Juan Iglesias, Madrid, vol. III, 1513-1524.

Palmer, R. E. A. (1970): The Archaic Community of the Romans, Cambridge.

Pani, M. (1979): Tendenze politiche della successione al principato di Augusto, Bari.

Paoli, J. (1962): “Le testament calatis comitiis et l’adoption d’Octave”, [en] Studi in onore di Emilio Betti, Milano, vol. III, 527-563.

Pettinger, A. (2012): The Republic in Danger. Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius, Oxford (https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601745.001.0001).

Pomeroy, S. B. (1976): “The relationship of the married woman to her blood relatives in Rome”, AncSoc 7, 215-227.

Prévost, M.-H.: (1949): Les adoptions politiques à Rome sous la République et le Principat (=Publications de l’Institut de Droit Romain de l’Université de Paris 5), Paris.

Prévost, M.-H.: (1950): “L’adoption d’Octave”, RIDA 4, 361-381.

Ribas Alba, J. Mª (2009²): Democracia en Roma. Introducción al derecho electoral romano (=Colección Derecho romano y ciencia jurídica europea: Sección nexum 6), Granada.

Roddaz, J.-M. (1984): Marcus Agrippa (=Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 253), Roma (https://doi.org/10.3406/befar.1984.1220).

Roddaz, J.-M. (1992): “Imperium: nature et competences à la fin de la République et au début de l’Empire”, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 3, 189-211 (https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.1992.1358).

Russo Ruggeri, C. (1990): La datio in adoptionem. 1. Origine, regime giuridico e riflessi politico-sociali in età repubblicana ed imperiale (=Pubblicazione degli Istituti di Scienze giuridiche, economiche, politiche e sociali 158), Milano.

Salazar Revuelta, M. (2016): “Livia. Modelo de princesa imperial en el marco del poder de la dinastía Julio-Claudia”, [en] R. Rodríguez López – Mª J. Bravo Bosch (eds.), Mujeres en tiempo de Augusto: realidad social e imposición legal, Valencia, 331-365.

Schmitthenner, W. (1973²): Oktavian und das Testament Cäsars. Eine Untersuchung zu den politischen Anfängen des Augustus (=Zetematata 4), München.

Seager, R. (2005²): Tiberius, Oxford (https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773871).

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1976): Two Studies in Roman Nomenclature (=American classical studies 3), New York.

Simpson, C. J. (1998): “Imp. Caesar Divi filius. His second imperatorial acclamation and the evolution of an allegedly "exorbitant" name”, Athenaeum 86/2, 419-437.

Suspène A. (2001): “Tiberius Claudianus contra Agrippa Postumus: autour de la dédicace du temple des Dioscures”, Rev. de philologie 75/1, 99-124 (https://doi.org/10.3917/phil.751.0099).

Syme, R.: (1939): The Roman Revolution, Oxford.

Syme, R.: (1988): “Clues to Testamentary Adoption”, [en] A. R. Birley (ed.), Roman Papers 4, Oxford, 159-173.

Tatum, W. J. (1999): The patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher, Chapel Hill–London.

Torrent, A. (1967): “La adrogatio en el sistema de sucesiones inter vivos”, RIDA 14, 447-454.

Vallar, S. (2013): “Adoção testamentária: direito ou poder do paterfamilias”, [en] Direito Romano. Poder e Direito. XV Congresso Internacional e XVIII Congresso Ibero-americano de Direito Romano, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1175-1187.

Valmaña, A. (1995): Las reformas políticas del censor Apio Caudio Ciego (=Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Tesis doctorales 38), Cuenca.

Voci, P. (1967²): Diritto ereditario romano. Vol. I. Introduzione. Parte Generale, Milano.

Wirszubski, Ch. (1950): Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate, Cambridge (https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518607).

Zecchini, G. (2010): “Augusto e l’eredità di Cesare”, [en] G. Urso (cur.), Cesare: precursore o visionario. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 17-19 settembre 2009 (=I convegni della Fondazione Niccolò Canussio 9), Pisa, 47-62.

Article download

PDF (Español (España))

Crossmark

Metrics

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

Castán S. (2020). Political and Legal Keys to Adoption in Republican and Augustan Age. Gerión. Revista de Historia Antigua, 38(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.5209/geri.68584

ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Varia

License

In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Gerión. Revista de Historia Antigua is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.

Political and Legal Keys to Adoption in Republican and Augustan Age

Abstract

Downloads

Article download

Crossmark

Metrics

License

Language

Redes Sociales

Information

logos

Web Feed Plugin

Make a Submission