Sátira contra la predilección del Derecho Romano: una crítica decimonónica a un orden jurídico todavía no fenecido
Abstract
The 18th century marks the transit towards a new form of conceiving, exposing and explaining the legal ordering. Until that moment the predominance of the Roman Common Law in the academic scope had supposed the concealment of domestic law. Since 1771 the borbonic reforming policy impels a turn of this tendency. Nevertheless, the successive reforms of the academic curricula do not manage to close this secular tendency immediately. The Satire we glossed and published here is a clear sample of how the predominance of the Roman Law continued being a reality still in 1826.Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Cuadernos de Historia del Derecho is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.