¿Universalismo moral de la Ilustración versus multiculturalismo en las sociedades del siglo XXI?

  • Fco. Javier ESPINOSA ANTÓN
Keywords: Multiculturalism, Moral universalism, Enlightenment, Cultural diversity, Moral values

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine whether the moral universalism of the Enlightenment is incompatible with the multiculturalism of the societies of the 21st century. That leads to study what the moral universalism of the Enlightenment was. Under the guiding hand of Habermas, the article uses a distinction between the procedural- formal project of the Enlightenment and the particular contents in order to highlight that the most important thing was the project and that the freedom of being different was at the heart of this project. This freedom was one of the most important values which the Enlightenment wanted to broaden, so not only is moral universalism compatible with cultural diversity but what makes it possible. Then the article considers two of the most important ways of understanding the multiculturalism, the points of view of Habermas and Appiah, to end up showing that even some of the most passionate defenders of multiculturalism, like Appiah or Parekh, admit that some universal moral values are essential for a multicultural world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2010-02-12
How to Cite
ESPINOSA ANTÓN F. J. . (2010). ¿Universalismo moral de la Ilustración versus multiculturalismo en las sociedades del siglo XXI? . Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 42, 219-241. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASEM/article/view/ASEM0909110219A
Section
Articles