El autómata versus el prójimo: Merleau-Ponty, crítico de Descartes

  • Karina P. Trilles Calvo
Keywords: Merleau-Ponty, Descartes, Alterity, Conscience, Body,

Abstract

With Cartesio appears the ontological rupture between the res cogitans and the res extensa, division that it goes accompanied by the dichotomy certainty – doubt. Applying this outline to the human being, we find a conscience separated from the world, a body-machine, a cogito and a body that aren’t intrinsically united. For that reason, the vision of a body is not to enter in contact with a conscience, which, ultimately, prevents to explain the other people's existence. Merleau-Ponty seeks to give solution to the problem of the alterity and, for that reason, he criticizes the Cartesian position. To give some few examples tried in this paper, Merleau-Ponty attacks the notion of conscience, the representation, the introspection, the reasoning for analogy…

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2009-01-29
How to Cite
Trilles Calvo K. P. (2009). El autómata versus el prójimo: Merleau-Ponty, crítico de Descartes. Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 41, 33-66. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASEM/article/view/ASEM0808110033A
Section
Articles