Crucial Experiments Vindicated
Keywords:
Duhem, epistemological holism, deductive confirmation, crucial evidence, wave theory of light.
Abstract
in this paper i assess Pierre Duhem’s criticism of crucial experiments, and argue that we have reasons to vindicate their existence. i then analize the experiments carried out by Fizeau and Foucault in 1850, and criticize Duhem’s interpretation of their results. i contend that the results of crucial experiences can be described in terms that are neutral with respect to the competing theories. For that reason an experimental result is relatively stable and open to different interpretations in the light of new theories. i conclude by distinguishing successful crucial experiments from decisive experiments. The former are meant to provide evidence that confirms one theory and disconfirms its rivals, but not necessarily to provide sufficient reasons for accepting or rejecting one of those theories.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article download
Crossmark
Published
2015-02-24
How to Cite
Cassini A. (2015). Crucial Experiments Vindicated. Revista de Filosofía , 40(1), 105-137. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RESF.2015.v40.n1.48442
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista de Filosofía is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
