How Do Continental and Analytic Traditions Confront the Philosophical Tradition
Keywords:
Continental Philosophy, Analytic Philosophy, Philosophy of History, Historical accuracy, Historicism.
Abstract
The relationship between present-day philosophy and philosophy of the past is a fundamental issue for understanding today’s philosophical division between “analytical” and “continental” philosophy. However, the opposition doesn’t lie in the mere rejection or acceptation of philosophy’s history. In fact, both philosophical traditions conceive the possibility of a dialog with the great philosophers of the past. This paper first characterizes the relationships with past philosophy in both traditions and arguments in favor of the relevancy of philosophy’s history for philosophy.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article download
Crossmark
How to Cite
Jaran F. (2012). How Do Continental and Analytic Traditions Confront the Philosophical Tradition. Revista de Filosofía , 36(1), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RESF.2011.v36.n1.37637
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista de Filosofía is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
