Evidence and other Injury Evaluation Losses. A Criticism of non Interdisciplinary Procedures

Abstract

Considering that the totality of analyses procedures of the scene or the morgue has the objective of collecting data, prints, signs and samples are feasible to become useful as judicial evidence, and taking into consideration that this normative for procedures makes it necessary for the medical examiner and evaluator to have an adequate capacitation and specialization to his field. In this paper, the interdisciplinary work and its perspectives of multiple functions, are proposed as the most efficient way for the collection of evidence because of the possibility of permanent loss if it is not fully recognized, recuperated and protected. Two interdisciplinary work cases are presented.