Whether Jung Was a Kantian?

  • Valentin Balanovskiy Independent Researcher
Palabras clave: Transcendental Idealism, Analytical Psychology, Psychic and Physic Experience

Resumen

Researchers often talk about a powerful heuristic potential of the Kantian heritage, but sometimes they do not show concrete examples in defense of this opinion outside Kantianism and Neo- Kantianism. This article contains an attempt to demonstrate that on the example of how efficiently C.G. Jung used Kant’s ideas to construct the theoretical basis of analytical psychology in general and his conception of archetypes in particular, we can see the urgency of Kant’s heritage not only for his direct spiritual successors. In addition the question is discussed: why did Jung claim that epistemologically he took his stand on Kant?

Biografía del autor/a

Valentin Balanovskiy, Independent Researcher
Valentin Balanovskiy (Ph.D., independent researcher, Russia) studied philosophy at Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University of Russia. The author specializes in history of philosophy. Key scientific interests are Kant’s transcendental philosophy, Jung’s analytical psychology, history of Russian philosophy, particularly Vladimir Solov’ev’s philosophical system, Alexander Bogdanov’s empiriomonism and tectology (the universal theory of organization), monodualism and energy theory of Nicolas Grot

Descarga artículo

Crossmark

Métricas

Publicado
2016-11-10
Cómo citar
Balanovskiy V. (2016). Whether Jung Was a Kantian?. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 4, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.163993
Sección
Sección monográfica ("Kant in Eastern Europe")