Public role of Criminal Law vs. private management of centers for juvenile reform

  • María Sonsoles Vidal Herrero-Vior Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Keywords: criminal law, public role, juvenile justice, reform system, regional jurisdiction, principle of equality, public or private ownership, management of centers, ARRMI, rehabilitation, re-socialization

Abstract

With the enactment in Spain of Law 5/2000 of January 12, on the Criminal Responsibility of Minors, the responsibility of enforcing court decisions has been granted to the Autonomous Communities. However, this does not violate the provisions of Article 117.3 of the Spanish Constitution which states that the exercise of the judicial function is solely responsibility of judges and courts who must «rule and have judgments executed». The practical execution of the judicial measures imposed on juveniles in reform centers corresponds to public entities; namely, these must execute the activities that aim at materially imposing the ruling decision, and therefore, that also aim at physically executing the penalty. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the State delegates the deprivation of a fundamental right such as the freedom of movement of minors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Sonsoles Vidal Herrero-Vior, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Profesora colaboradora de Derecho Penal

Crossmark

Metrics

How to Cite
Vidal Herrero-Vior M. S. (2011). Public role of Criminal Law vs. private management of centers for juvenile reform. FORO. Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Nueva Época, 11-12, 231-289. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/FORO/article/view/37213
Section
Critical Literatura. New Publications