Investment in rural development programmes. Its territorial distribution in the province of Granada
Keywords:
Initiatives LEADER I, II and , PRODER I and II Programs, Public investment, Social and territorial inequalities, Rural development
Abstract
Initiatives LEADER I, II and +, as well as PRODER I and II Programs have produced benefits in rural zones were they have been developed, for instance the province of Granada. Nevertheless, there have been other undesirable effects derived from them such as investment territorial distribution, which has favoured the most dynamics councils, or the limited role of public investment redistribution. As a consequence territorial and social disparities have been remarked favouring regional center and the most active municipalities thus restricting the access to these aids of peripheral towns which continue suffering drift from the land.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article download
Crossmark
Published
2010-01-18
How to Cite
Cejudo García E. y Navarro Valverde F. A. (2010). Investment in rural development programmes. Its territorial distribution in the province of Granada. Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense, 29(2), 37-64. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/AGUC/article/view/AGUC0909220037A
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
