Reply to Hutchison and Loomis

  • Dennis R. Proffitt
  • Jeanine Stefanucci
  • Tom Banton
  • William Epstein
Palabras clave: Distance perception, Spatial perception, Energetics, Perceived location, Intention

Resumen

Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003) reported a set of studies showing that the perceived distance to a target is influenced by the effort required to walk to its location. Hutchison and Loomis (H&L) reported an experiment that failed to find a significant influence of effort on indices of apparent distance. There were numerous important differences between the design and methods of H&L’s study and those of Proffitt et al. Moreover, there are important theoretical reasons to believe that these differences were responsible for the different results. The theoretical motivation of H&L’s studies was also brought into question.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Descarga artículo

Crossmark

Métricas

Publicado
2006-11-24
Cómo citar
Proffitt D. R. ., Stefanucci J. ., Banton T. . y Epstein W. (2006). Reply to Hutchison and Loomis. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 340-342. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/SJOP/article/view/SJOP0606220340A
Sección
Artículos