Ningún hombre es una isla.* Meditación en torno a la (im)posibilidad de la responsabilidad moral
Keywords:
Philosophy of Action, Moral Responsibility, Agent, Compatibilism, Incompatibilism, Determinism, Free Will, Social Identity,
Abstract
The Strawson’s Basic Argument is the stronger against moral responsibility in Philosophy of action. One should be responsible of his identity to be moral responsible of his actions, but then nobody could be never responsible. In this article I criticize orthodox solutions to Strawson’s sceptical challenge and show how they share with the Argument the same theological notion of monadical agent. A new solution needs a new conception of agent..Format
Crossmark
Published
2006-02-14
How to Cite
Raga Rosaleny, V. (2006). Ningún hombre es una isla.* Meditación en torno a la (im)posibilidad de la responsabilidad moral. Revista de Filosofía , 30(2), 193-213. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/RESF0505220193A
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista de Filosofía is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
