Intervention in Electronic Communications
Abstract
Judicial intervention in private communications, especially electronic ones, requires compliance with mandatory requirements in order to grant legitimacy and avoid procedural nullity. In Spain it is the doctrine of the courts that continues to establish these requirements. There is a need for urgent reform of the procedural law governing such action. Validly incorporating digital material to the process requires action specific to how records are filed and how expert intervention is processed, the court clerk’s authority to attest documents and compliance with the so-called chain of custody to prevent its alteration. There would be a violation of fundamental European rights on personal data protection, on freedom of communication and freedom of enterprise in the indiscriminate filtering of all Internet service providers customers, if general and indiscriminate legal measures are to be taken to stop or prevent file downloads of intellectual property using peer-to-peer software.Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Foro. Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.



