(Analytic) Philosophy of Sport: at the Turn of the 20th to the 21st Century

  • Paulo Antunes Centro de Filosofía, Política y Cultura
Keywords: (deep) conventionalism, formalism, internalism, interpretivism, mutualism
Agencies: 1 Este artículo fue financiado por el Praxis – Centro de Filosofía, Política y Cultura en el marco del proyecto UID/05451/2025 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/05451/2025), financiado por fondos nacionales a través de la Fundación para la Ciencia y la Tecnología.

Abstract

This article explores the philosophy of sport today, particularly its development within the analytic tradition. Within this subfield of philosophy—the philosophy of sport—various interpretations of sporting activity have emerged following Bernard Suits’s seminal work The Grasshopper (1978). These range from “sport conventionalism,” in its “reductive,” “deep,” or “ethical” variants, to “sport interpretivism” (or “broad internalism”), whose main version during the first decades of this century has been the “mutualist” approach. The debate is presented through the voices of its main interlocutors: W.J. Morgan, R.L. Simon, and J.S. Russell. In the end, the initially expository tone gives way to a more critical indication pointing toward the future of the debate.

View Citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2026-04-24
How to Cite
Antunes, P. (2026). (Analytic) Philosophy of Sport: at the Turn of the 20th to the 21st Century. Revista de Filosofía , 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5209/resf.105870
Issue
Section
Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.