Abducción y "lógica docens"

Antonio Duarte Calvo

doi:10.5209/RESF.60198

Abduction and "logica docens"

Antonio Duarte Calvo Complutense University of Madrid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/RESF.60198

Keywords: abduction, insight, instinct, logica docens, logica utens.

Abstract

In this article I analyze the Peirce’s concepts of abduction, insight, logica utens and logica docens in order to propose, finally, a vision in which “genuine” abductions are generated only after an exercise in logica docens. These “genuine” abductions are characterized in contrast to those generated by means of logica utens.

View Citations

References

Aliseda, A. (1998): “La abducción como cambio epistémico: C. S. Peirce y las teorías epistémicas en la inteligencia artificial”, En C. S. Peirce y la abducción, Analogía Filosófica XII/1, pp. 125-144. http://www.unav.es/gep/AN/Aliseda.pdf

Anderson, D. R. (1986): “The Evolution of Peirce’s Concept of Abduction”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 22 (2), pp. 145-164.

Anderson, D. R. (1987): Creativity and the philosophy of C.S. Peirce, Martinus Nijhoff.

Anderson, D. R. (2005): “The esthetic attitude of abduction”, Semiotica, 153 (1), 9-22.

Ayim, M. (1974): “Retroduction: The Rational Instinct”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 10 (1), pp. 34-43.

Baroja, P. (1982)/[1942-1943]: Desde la última vuelta del camino (Memorias). Familia, infancia y juventud, Caro Raggio, Editor.

Burks, A. W. (1946): “Peirce’s Theory of Abduction”, En Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13, Nº 4, (pp. 301-306). The University of Chicago Press. http://people.ucsc.edu/~ktellez/abduction.pdf

Cathcart T. y D. Klein (2009)/[2008]: Platón y un ornitorrinco entran en un bar... La filosofía explicada con humor, Editorial Planeta.

Chiasson, P. (2001): “Logica Utens”, http://www.digitalpeirce.fee.unicamp.br/p-logchi.htm

Cuthbert, L., B. duBoulay, D. Teather, B. Teather, M. Sharples y G. duBoulay (1999): “Expert/Novice differences in Diagnostic Medical Cognition - A Review of the Literature”, Cognitive Science Research Paper, CSRP 508, ISSN 1350-3162.

Debrock, G. (1998): ‘’El ingenioso enigma de la abducción”, (Traducción de Itziar Aragüés), En C. S. Peirce y la abducción, Analogía Filosófica XII/1, pp. 21-40. http://www.unav.es/gep/AN/Debrock.html

Doyle, A. C. (2008)/[1887-1917]: Todo Sherlock Holmes, Ediciones Cátedra.

Duarte, A. (2014): “Asesinos en la oscuridad”, Revista de Ciencias y Humanidades de la Fundación Ramón Areces, 12, pp. 97-106. http://sgfm.elcorteingles.es/SGFM/FRA/recursos/doc/Revista/33069004_221220149599.pdf

Duarte, A. (2015): “Abducción y diálogo persuasivo: Elemental, querido Peirce”, Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 11, pp. 1-33. http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RIA/article/view/13372/pdf_14

Eco, U. y T. A. Sebeok (eds.) (1988)/[1983]: The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press.

Fann, K. T. (1970): Peirce’s Theory of Abduction, Ed. Martinus Nijhoff – The Hague.

Génova, G. (1997): Charles S. Peirce: La lógica del descubrimiento, Cuadernos de Anuario Filosófico 45., Pamplona, Universidad de Navarra. http://www.unav.es/gep/Genova/Genova.pdf

Hintikka, J. (1998): “What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXIV (3), 503-533.

Josephson, J. R y M. C. Tanner (1996)/[1994]: “Conceptual analysis of abduction”. En J. R. Josephson y S. G. Josephson (Eds.), Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 5-30. http://web.cse.ohio-state.edu/~jj/pubs/AbdInfCh1.pdf

Kapitan, T. (1992). “Peirce and the Autonomy of Abductive Reasoning”. Erkenntnis, 37, 1-26. http://www.niu.edu/kapitan/pdf/PeirceandtheAutonomyofAbductiveReasoning1992.pdf

Niño, D. (2001): “Peirce, abducción y práctica médica”, Anuario Filosófico, 34 (1), pp. 57-74. http://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/762/6/3.%20PEIRCE,%20ABDUCCI%C3%93N%20Y%20PR%C3%81CTICA%20M%C3%89DICA,%20DOUGLAS%20NI%C3%91O.pdf

Niño, D. (2007): Abducting Abduction. Avatares sobre la comprensión de la Abducción de Charles S. Peirce, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Colombia http://www.unav.es/gep/TesisDoctorales/TesisDoctoralDouglasNino.pdf

Nubiola, J. (1998): “Walker Percy y Charles S. Peirce: abducción y lenguaje”, En C. S. Peirce y la abducción, Analogía Filosófica XII/1, pp. 3-8. http://www.unav.es/gep/AN/Nubiola.html

Nubiola, J. (2005): “Abduction or the Logic of Surprise”, Semiotica, 153 (1/4), pp. 117-130. http://www.unav.es/users/AbductionLogicSurprise.pdf

Paavola, S. (2004): “Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: The importance of strategies”, Fundations of Science, 9, 267-283. https://www.academia.edu/2974174/Abduction_as_a_logic_and_methodology_of_discovery_The_importance_of_strategies

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958)/[1860-1913]: Collected Papers, vols. 1-8, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss y A. W. Burks (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (CP)

Peirce, C. S. (1966) /[1860-1913]: The Charles S. Peirce Papers. 32 rollos de microfilms de los manuscritos conservados en la Houghton Library, Cambridge: Harvard University Library, Photographic Service. (MS)

Pietarinen, A.-V. (2005): “Cultivating habits of reason: Peirce and the logica utens versus logica docens distinction”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 22(4), 357-372.

Rescher, N. (1978): Peirce’s Philosophy of Science. Critical Studies in His Theory of Induction and Scientific Method, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (Indiana).

Ross, W. D. (1965)/[1949]: Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford University, London.

Santaella, L. (1998): “La evolución de los tres tipos de argumento: Abducción, inducción y deducción”, En C. S. Peirce y la abducción, Analogía Filosófica XII/1, pp. 9-20. http://www.unav.es/gep/AN/Santaella.html

Schmidt, H. G., P. P. Hobus, V. L. Patel., H. P. A. y Boshuizen (1987): “Contextual factors in the activation of first hypotheses: Expert-Novices differences”, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C. http://users.sussex.ac.uk/~bend/papers/csrp508.pdf

Sebeok, T. A y J. Umiker-Sebeok (1988)/[1983]: “’You Know My Method.’ A Juxtaposition of Sherlock Holmes and C.S. Peirce”, En U. Eco y T. A. Sebeok (Eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, (pp.11-54). Indiana University Press.

Walton, D. N. (2004): Abductive Reasoning, The University of Alabama Press.

Format

PDF (Spanish)

Crossmark

Metrics

Published

2018-05-14

How to Cite

Duarte Calvo, A. (2018). Abduction and "logica docens". Revista de Filosofía , 43(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.5209/RESF.60198

ABNT
ACM
ACS
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 43 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista de Filosofía is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.

Abduction and "logica docens"

Abstract

Format

Crossmark

Metrics

License

Similar Articles

Language

Information

logos

Redes-sociales

Latest publications

Make a Submission