The Harm Principle: Balancing Social Progress in John Stuart Mill’s Political Philosophy
Abstract
This article argues that the harm principle is a mechanism that seeks to strike a balance between individual judgement and social stability. I will refute the claim that the harm principle can be interpreted in a paternalistic way and, instead, argue that the purpose of John Stuart Mill’s view of the harm principle was to foster social progress. Therefore, Mill’s emphasis often shifted from individual freedom to social control. Contrary to what some scholars claim, this was not the result of an inconsistency in his thinking but was derived from his focus on social progress.
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Foro Interno. Anuario de Teoría Política is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.