What do we know about reading and spelling in shallow orthographies?
- Xenia Schmalz University Hospital; University Hospital
Resumen
La investigación sobre lectura y ortografía se ha centrado tradicionalmente en el inglés, a pesar de sus diferencias significativas con otras ortografías europeas. Este enfoque anglocéntrico plantea dudas sobre la generalización de las teorías de lectura a las ortografías alfabéticas en general. Comprender las diferencias lingüísticas en la adquisición de la lectura es crucial, dado su impacto en la enseñanza de la alfabetización y la intervención en dislexia. Las ortografías poco profundas permiten un aprendizaje más rápido de las correspondencias grafema-fonema, mientras que las ortografías profundas pueden requerir una mayor dependencia de estrategias alternativas, como la adivinación léxica y el uso de unidades subléxicas más grandes. Los mecanismos cognitivos que subyacen al desarrollo de la fluidez, en particular el papel de las representaciones léxicas de alta calidad, plantean preguntas abiertas para futuras investigaciones. La precisión en la ortografía también se ve afectada por la profundidad ortográfica, con mayores desafíos en ortografías profundas debido a la ambigüedad en las relaciones fonema-grafema. Aunque la enseñanza de la fonética está bien establecida, la investigación sobre cómo mejorar el procesamiento léxico para favorecer la fluidez lectora y la adquisición de la ortografía sigue siendo limitada. Este artículo sintetiza los hallazgos actuales sobre las diferencias lingüísticas en la alfabetización, destaca las lagunas en la investigación y analiza las implicaciones prácticas para la enseñanza de la lectura y la escritura en diversas ortografías alfabéticas.
Referencias
References
Acha, J., Rodriguez, N., & Perea, M. (2023). The role of letter knowledge acquisition ability on children's decoding and word identification: Evidence from an artificial orthography. Journal of Research in Reading, 46(4), 358-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12432
Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 229-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830050154485
Asfaha, Y. M., Kurvers, J., & Kroon, S. (2009). Grain size in script and teaching: Literacy acquisition in Ge'ez and Latin. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(04), 709. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716409990087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990087
Bakos, S., Landerl, K., Bartling, J., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2018). Neurophysiological correlates of word processing deficits in isolated reading and isolated spelling disorders. Clinical neurophysiology, 129(3), 526-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.12.010
Banfi, C., Kemény, F., Gangl, M., Schulte-Körne, G., Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2018). Visual attention span performance in German-speaking children with differential reading and spelling profiles: No evidence of group differences. PloS one, 13(6), e0198903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198903
Blasi, D. E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E., Kemmerer, D., & Majid, A. (2022). Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. Trends in cognitive sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.015
Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & Groot, A. M. D. (2005). Onset entropy matters–Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing, 18, 211-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353
Caravolas, M. (2004). Spelling development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. European psychologist, 9(1), 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.3
Caravolas, M., Leråg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavsky, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Salas, N., Schöffeloà, M., Defior, S., Mikulajoà, M., Seidloà-Màlkoà, G., & Hulme, C. (2012). Common Patterns of Prediction of Literacy Development in Different Alphabetic Orthographies. Psychological Science, 23(6), 678-686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536
Carioti, D., Masia, M. F., Travellini, S., & Berlingeri, M. (2021). Orthographic depth and developmental dyslexia: A meta-analytic study. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(3), 399-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00226-0
Carrillo, M. S., Alegría, J., & Marín, J. (2013). On the acquisition of some basic word spelling mechanisms in a deep (French) and a shallow (Spanish) system. Reading and Writing, 26, 799-819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9391-6
Castles, A., & Nation, K. (2010). How does orthographic learning happen? In From inkmarks to ideas (pp. 181-209). Psychology Press.
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Colenbrander, D., Wang, H.-C., Arrow, T., & Castles, A. (2020). Teaching irregular words: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we can go from here. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 37(2), 97-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2020.11
Coltheart, M. (2015). What kinds of things cause children’s reading difficulties? Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 20(2), 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2015.1114000
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204-256. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.108.1.204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.108.1.204
Crawford, M., Raheel, N., Korochkina, M., & Rastle, K. (2025). Inadequate foundational decoding skills constrain global literacy goals for pupils in low-and middle-income countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(1), 74-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02028-x
De Simone, E., Beyersmann, E., Mulatti, C., Mirault, J., & Schmalz, X. (2021). Order among chaos: Cross-linguistic differences and developmental trajectories in pseudoword reading aloud using pronunciation Entropy. PloS one, 16(5), e0251629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251629
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00077.x
Ehri, L. C. (2022). What teachers need to know and do to teach letter–sounds, phonemic awareness, word reading, and phonics. The Reading Teacher, 76(1), 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2095
Ellis, N. C., Natsume, M., Stavropoulou, K., Hoxhallari, L., Van Daal, V. H., Polyzoe, N., TSIPA, M. L., & Petalas, M. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 438-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5
Franceschini, S., Trevisan, P., Ronconi, L., Bertoni, S., Colmar, S., Double, K., Facoetti, A., & Gori, S. (2017). Action video games improve reading abilities and visual-to-auditory attentional shifting in English-speaking children with dyslexia. Scientific reports, 7(1), 5863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05826-8
Frith, U. (1986). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 67-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648022
Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in Phonological Recoding in German- and English-Speaking Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(1), 31-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0201_2
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for Visual Word Recognition and Orthographic Depth: A Multilingual Comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13(1), 104-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.13.1.104
Gabay, Y., Thiessen, E. D., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Impaired statistical learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 934-945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0324
Galuschka, K., Görgen, R., Kalmar, J., Haberstroh, S., Schmalz, X., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2020). Effectiveness of spelling interventions for learners with dyslexia: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1659794
Galuschka, K., Ise, E., Krick, K., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS one, 9(2), e89900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089900
Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Manolitsis, G., Lyytinen, H., & Parrila, R. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25, 321-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
Görgen, R., De Simone, E., Schulte‐Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2021). Predictors of reading and spelling skills in German: The role of morphological awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 210-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12343
Goswami, U. (2005). Synthetic phonics and learning to read: A cross‐language perspective. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21(4), 273-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360500344823
Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.170
Häikiö, T., & Vainio, S. (2018). Syllables and inflectional morphemes in early Finnish readers: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Child Language, 45(5), 1227-1245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000132
Heikkilä, R., Aro, M., Närhi, V., Westerholm, J., & Ahonen, T. (2013). Does training in syllable recognition improve reading speed? A computer-based trial with poor readers from second and third grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 398-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.753452
Huemer, S., Landerl, K., Aro, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Training reading fluency among poor readers of German: Many ways to the goal. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 115-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-008-0017-2
Huemer, S., Moll, K., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2018). Onlinebasierte Leseförderung für Grundschüler: Das Konzept „Meister Cody–Namagi “. Lernen und Lernstörungen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1024/2235-0977/a000230
Huettig, F., & Ferreira, F. (2022). The Myth of Normal Reading. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17456916221127226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221127226
Ise, E., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2010). Spelling deficits in dyslexia: Evaluation of an orthographic spelling training. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 18-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0035-8
Jabbour-Danial, M., Share, D. L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Y. (2024). Not just phonology: a longitudinal study of dyslexia subtypes based on the distinction between reading accuracy and reading rate. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 3, 1390391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2024.1390391
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The Reading Process is Different for Different Orthographies: The Orthographic Depth Hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 67-84). Elsevier Science Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2
Kyle, F., Kujala, J., Richardson, U., Lyytinen, H., & Goswami, U. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of two theoretically motivated computer‐assisted reading interventions in the United Kingdom: GG Rime and GG Phoneme. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 61-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.038
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: an 8-year follow-up. Journal of educational psychology, 100(1), 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150
Lázaro, M., García, L., & Burani, C. (2015). How orthographic transparency affects morphological processing in young readers with and without reading disability. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(5), 498-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12213
Lázaro, M., & Calvo, J. A. (2013). Rehabilitación morfológica en trastornos del lenguaje: necesidad clínica avalada por evidencia experimental. Revista latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(1), 111-120.
Lehtonen, A., & Bryant, P. (2005). Active players or just passive bystanders? The role of morphemes in spelling development in a transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(2), 137-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050113
Lei, L., Pan, J., Liu, H., McBride‐Chang, C., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Tardif, T., Liang, W., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Developmental trajectories of reading development and impairment from ages 3 to 8 years in Chinese children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(2), 212-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02311.x
Lovio, R., Halttunen, A., Lyytinen, H., Näätänen, R., & Kujala, T. (2012). Reading skill and neural processing accuracy improvement after a 3-hour intervention in preschoolers with difficulties in reading-related skills. Brain Research, 1448, 42-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.071
Lukatela, G., Popadić, D., & Turvey, M. (1980). Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography. Memory & Cognition, 8(2), 124-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213415
Marinus, E., de Jong, P., & van der Leij, A. (2012). Increasing word-reading speed in poor readers: no additional benefits of explicit letter-cluster training. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 166-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.554471
Marinus, E., Nation, K., & de Jong, P. (2015). Density and length in the neighbourhood: Explaining cross-linguistic differences in learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.006
McArthur, G., & Castles, A. (2017). Helping children with reading difficulties: Some things we have learned so far. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0008-3
McTigue, E. M., Solheim, O. J., Zimmer, W. K., & Uppstad, P. H. (2020). Critically reviewing GraphoGame across the world: Recommendations and cautions for research and implementation of computer‐assisted instruction for word‐reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 45-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.256
Mehlhase, H., Bakos, S., Landerl, K., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2019). Orthographic learning in children with isolated and combined reading and spelling deficits. Child Neuropsychology, 25(3), 370-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2018.1470611
Mehlhase, H., Sigmund, J. L., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2025). Sound–symbol learning and the relationship to spelling in first-grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 252, 106158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106158
Mousikou, P., Beyersmann, E., Ktori, M., Javourey‐Drevet, L., Crepaldi, D., Ziegler, J. C., Grainger, J., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Orthographic consistency influences morphological processing in reading aloud: Evidence from a cross‐linguistic study. Developmental Science, 23(6), e12952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12952
Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 7-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00329.x
Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0004-7
Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53(1), 13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867328
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of functional literacy, 11, 67-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.11.14per
Perry, C., & Long, H. (2022). What is going on with visual attention in reading and dyslexia? A critical review of recent studies. Brain Sciences, 12(1), 87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010087
Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 106-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.6.2
Saiegh–Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 431-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000225
Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Predicting word-level reading fluency outcomes in three contrastive groups: Remedial and computer-assisted remedial reading intervention, and mainstream instruction. Learning and individual differences, 20(5), 402-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.004
Schmalz, X., Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., & Marinus, E. (2016). Unpredictability and complexity of print-to-speech correspondences increase reliance on lexical processes: More evidence for the orthographic depth hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 658-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1182172
Schmalz, X., Marinus, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22(6), 1614-1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
Schmalz, X., Moll, K., Mulatti, C., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). Is statistical learning ability related to reading ability, and if so, why? Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 64-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1482304
Schmalz, X., Mulatti, C., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2022). Effects of complexity and unpredictability on the learning of an artificial orthography. Cortex, 152, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.014
Schmalz, X., Robidoux, S., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., & Marinus, E. (2017). German and English bodies: No evidence for cross-linguistic differences in preferred orthographic grain size. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.72
Schmalz, X., Treccani, B., & Mulatti, C. (2021). Developmental Dyslexia, Reading Acquisition, and Statistical Learning: A Sceptic’s Guide. Brain Sciences, 11(9), 1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091143
Schmitterer, A. M., & Schroeder, S. (2019). Grain size effects in rime judgment across literacy development in German. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 673-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000784
Schroeder, S., Häikiö, T., Pagan, A., Dickins, J. H., Hyona, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Eye Movements of Children and Adults Reading in Three Different Orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001099
Schulte-Körne, G., & Bruder, J. (2010). Clinical neurophysiology of visual and auditory processing in dyslexia: a review. Clinical neurophysiology, 121(11), 1794-1809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.028
Serrano, F., Genard, N., Sucena, A., Defior, S., Alegria, J., Mousty, P., Leybaert, J., Castro, S. L., & Seymour, P. H. (2011). Variations in reading and spelling acquisition in Portuguese, French and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.106
Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
Shany, M., Asadi, I., & Share, D. L. (2023). Accuracy-disability versus rate-disability subtypes of dyslexia: A validation study in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading, 27(2), 136-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2106866
Shany, M., & Share, D. L. (2011). Subtypes of reading disability in a shallow orthography: A double dissociation between accuracy-disabled and rate-disabled readers of Hebrew. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 64-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0047-4
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
Share, D. L. (2008a). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an" outlier" orthography. Psychological bulletin, 134(4), 584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
Share, D. L. (2008b). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and self-teaching. In Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 36, pp. 31-82). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)00002-5
Share, D. L. (2021). Is the science of reading just the science of reading English? Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S391-S402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.401
Sigmund, J. L., Mehlhase, H., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2024). Early cognitive predictors of spelling and reading in German-speaking children. Frontiers in Education, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378313
Sodoro, J., Allinder, R. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Assessment of phonological awareness: Review of methods and tools. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 223-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016050412323
Suárez-Coalla, P., Ramos, S., Álvarez-Cañizo, M., & Cuetos, F. (2014). Orthographic learning in dyslexic Spanish children. Annals of Dyslexia, 64, 166-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-014-0092-5
Thaler, V., Ebner, E. M., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 89-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0005-0
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2022). Statistical learning in word reading and spelling across languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 139-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1920951
Tressoldi, P. E., Stella, G., & Faggella, M. (2001). The development of reading speed in Italians with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of learning disabilities, 34(5), 414-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400503
Valdois, S., Bosse, M.-L., Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., Zorman, M., David, D., & Pellat, J. (2003). Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Reading and Writing, 16(6), 541-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025501406971
van Daal, V. H., & Wass, M. (2017). First-and second-language learnability explained by orthographic depth and orthographic learning: A “natural” Scandinavian experiment. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(1), 46-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1251437
van den Bosch, A., Content, A., Daelemans, W., & de Gelder, B. (1994). Measuring the complexity of writing systems. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1(3), 178-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179408590015
van Witteloostuijn, M., Boersma, P., Wijnen, F., & Rispens, J. (2019). Statistical learning abilities of children with dyslexia across three experimental paradigms. PloS one, 14(8), e0220041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220041
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2022). Universals in learning to read across languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 150-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1938575
Viise, N. M., Richards, H. C., & Pandis, M. (2011). Orthographic depth and spelling acquisition in Estonian and English: A comparison of two diverse alphabetic languages. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(4), 425-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.587327
Wimmer, H. (2006). Don't neglect reading fluency! Developmental Science, 9(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00527.x
Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: a specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.272
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological bulletin, 131(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(3), 169-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00139-5
Formato
Crossmark
Licencia
La Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, para fomentar el intercambio global del conocimiento, facilita el acceso sin restricciones a sus contenidos desde el momento de su publicación en la presente edición electrónica, y por eso es una revista de acceso abierto. Los originales publicados en esta revista son propiedad de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid y es obligatorio citar su procedencia en cualquier reproducción total o parcial. Todos los contenidos se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario. Puede consultar la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia.
