Sistematicidad, productividad y composicionalidad: Una aproximación pragmatista
Keywords:
Pragmatism, Representationalism, Concepts, Meaning, Context, Fodor, Lepore
Abstract
In this paper I address the two main arguments most commonly asserted in defence of the Principle of Compositionality, in an attempt to demonstrate that Fodor and Lepore’s account of the latter misunderstands the productivity and systematicity of natural languages, leading them to an atomistic and representationalist stance on meanings and concepts. In contrast, I claim that a pragmatistic approach to language and thought is not only compatible with compositionality, but that it also provides a more accurate approach to systematicity and productivity.Format
Crossmark
Published
2009-10-06
How to Cite
Liñán Ocaña, J. L. (2009). Sistematicidad, productividad y composicionalidad: Una aproximación pragmatista. Revista de Filosofía , 34(1), 51-75. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/RESF0909120051A
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista de Filosofía is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
