Luis Moises López Flores

Prudencia epistémica en Kant

Luis Moises López Flores Tecnológico de Monterrey

Palabras clave: Kant, antropología pragmática, epistemología social, habilidad pragmática, egoísmo lógico

Resumen

En la presente investigación propongo el concepto de prudencia epistémica. La prudencia epistémica es la habilidad social para influir en los demás para fines socio-cognitivos. Como habilidad pragmática, la prudencia epistémica consiste no sólo en una descripción de los orígenes empíricos del error (esto es sólo psicología empírica), sino en la habilidad social para evitar el error y otros males cognitivos frutos del egoísmo lógico y otros vicios epistémicos.

Biografía del autor/a

Luis Moises López Flores, Tecnológico de Monterrey

Profesor-investigador del Tecnológico de Monterrey

Ver citas

Citas

Aubenque, P. (1975), “La prudence chez Kant”, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, no. 80(2), pp. 156- 182.

Bacin, S. (2019), “The Error in the Groundwork: Kant’s Revision of the Imperatives and Prudence as Technical Ability”, Studia Kantiana, no. 17(1), pp. 29-48.

Baiasu, S., Pihlström, S. y Williams, H. (eds.), (2011), Politics and Metaphysics in Kant, Wiltshire, University of Wales Press.

Baumgarten, A. (2014), Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes and Related Materials, Traducción, edición e introducción de Courtney D. Fugate y John Hymers, London, Bloomsbury.

Clewis, R. (ed.), (2015), Reading Kant’s Lectures, Berlin/Boston, Walter de Gruyter.

Cohen, A. (ed.), (2014), Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, London, Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, A. (2009), Kant and the Human Sciences, Biology, Anthropology and History, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Delannoi, G. (1995), “La prudence dans l'histoire de la pensé”, Mots, no. 44, pp. 101-105.

Elden, S. y Mendieta, E., (eds.), (2011), Reading Kant's Geography, New York, SUNY Press.

Frierson, P. (2014), Kant’s Empirical Psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Gelfert, A. (2010), “Kant and the Enlightenment’s Contribution to Social Epistemology”, Episteme, no. 7(1), pp. 79-99.

Gelfert, A. (2006), “Kant on Testimony”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, no.14(4), pp. 627-652.

Goldman, A. y Whitcomb, D. (eds.), (2011). Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York, Oxford University Press.

Graband, C. (2015), Klugheit bei Kant, Kantsudien-Ergaenzunghefte, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

Haddock, A., Millar, A. y Pritchard, D. (eds.), (2010), Social Epistemology, New York, Oxford University Press.

Hanna, R. (2006), Kant, Science and Human Nature, New York, Oxford University Press.

Hatfield, G. (2014), “Kant on the Phenomenology of Touch and Vision” en Alix Cohen (ed.), Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, London, Cambridge University Press.

Kain, P. (2003), “Prudential Reason in Kant´s Anthropology”, en B. Jacobs y P. Kain Patrick (eds.), Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, New York, Oxford University Press.

Kant, I. Gesammelte Schriften Hrsg.: Bd. 1–22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin 1900ff.

Kerstein, S. (2009), “Treating Others Merely as Means”, Utilitas, no. 21(2), pp. 163-180.

Korsgaard, C. (1996), Creating the Kingdom of Ends, New York, Cambridge University Press.

López, M. (2018), “¿Ética pura o ética impura? Kant, el racismo y la ceguera del color”, en G. Leyva et alia (eds.), Los Rostros de la razón: Immanuel Kant desde Hispanoamérica. Tomo 2. pp. 99-126

Louden, R. (2011), Kant’s Human Being Essays on his Theory of Human Nature, New York, Oxford University Press.

Louden, R. (2000), Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings, New York, Oxford University Press.

Ludwig, B. (2006), “Kant´s Hypothetical Imperatives (GMS, 417-419)”, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, C. Horn y D. Schönecker (eds.), New York-Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

Pasternack, L. (2014a). “Kant’s Touchstone of Communication and the Public Use of Reason”, Society and Politics, no. 8(1), pp. 78-91.

Pasternack, L. (2014b), “Kant on Opinion: Assent, Hypothesis, and the Norms of General Applied Logic”, Kant-Studien, no. 105, 41–82.

Rawls, J. (1980), “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980”, Journal of Philosophy, no. 77, pp. 515-572.

Sweet, K. (2013), Kant on Practical Life. From Duty to History, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Tolley, C. (2007), Kant’s Conception of Logic, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Vidal, F. (2011), The Sciences of the Soul: The Early Modern Origins of Psychology, Traducción al inglés de S. Brown, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Wilson, H. (2006), Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology. Its Origin, Meaning and Critical Significance, New York, State University New York

Wilson, H. (2016), “Kant’s Anthropology as Klugheitslehre”, CON-TEXTOS KANTIANOS. International Journal of Philosophy, no. 3, pp. 122-138

Zagzebski, L. (1996), Virtues of The Mind. An Inquiry into The Nature of Virtue and The Ethical Foundations of Knowledge, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Zammito, J. (2018), The Gestation of German Biology: Philosophy and Physiology from Stahl To Schelling, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Zinkstok, J. (2011). “Anthropology, Empirical Psychology, and Applied Logic”. Kant Yearbook 2011: Anthropology, no. 3, pp. 107-130.

Descarga artículo

PDF
HTML

Crossmark

Métricas

Publicado

2021-12-15

Cómo citar

López Flores L. M. (2021). Prudencia epistémica en Kant. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 14, 369-388. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/KANT/article/view/89444