An “American Galton”: Frederick Adams Woods and the eugenic foundations of historiometry
- C. R. McCann, Jr Independent scholar
- Luca Fiorito University of Palermo; Universidad de Palermo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-0365
Resumen
Este artículo explora la vida y obra de Frederick Adams Woods (1873-1939), una figura destacada, aunque olvidada, de la eugenesia de la Era Progresista. Conocido como el “Galton americano”, Woods promovió un hereditarismo inflexible y desarrolló la historiometría, un método cuantitativo que intenta demostrar la primacía de la herencia en la configuración de la inteligencia, la moralidad y los resultados históricos. Sus estudios sobre la realeza europea y su teoría de la “herencia alternativa” buscaron refinar el enfoque de Galton, a la vez que reforzaban las reivindicaciones eugenésicas. Si bien su influencia se desvaneció a medida que las perspectivas ambientalistas ganaron terreno, Woods sigue siendo relevante como una voz destacada en el campo de la herencia y uno de los primeros defensores de la cuantificación de la historia como ciencia.
Referencias
Asdell, S. A. 1948. “The Relation between Inbreeding and Intelligence,” Human Biology, 20(4), December, pp. 171-181.
Bigelow, R. P. 1940. “Frederick Adams Woods (1873-1939),” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 74(6), pp. 162-163.
Boston Globe. 1919. “Dr Frederick A. Woods Is Sued for Divorce,” July 14, p. 11.
Browne, C. A. 1911. “The Comparative Value of Methods for Estimating Fame,” Science, New series, 33(855), May 19, pp. 770-773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.33.855.770
Cattell, J. McKeen. 1906. “A Statistical Study of American Men of Science: The Selection of a Group of One Thousand Scientific Men,” Science, New Series, 24(621), November 23, pp. 658-665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.24.621.658
Chamisso, Adelbert von. 1819. De animalibus quibusdam e classe vermium Linnaeana in circumnavigatione terrae auspicante Comite N. Romanzoff duce Ottone de Kotzebue annis 1815. 1816. 1817. 1818. peracta observatis. Fasciculus primus. De Salpa. c. tab. 1. Berlin: F. Dümmler Verlag.
Cohen, Adam. 2016. The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. New York: Penguin.
Cooley, Charles Horton, and Frederick Adams Woods. 1920 “A Discussion of Popenoe and Johnson’s ‘Applied Eugenics’ and the Question of Heredity vs. Environment,” Journal of Heredity, 11(2), February, pp. 80-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101974
Cox, Catharine Morris. 1926. The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. Genetic Studies of Genius, volume II: Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Davenport, Charles B. 1939. “Frederick Adams Woods,” Science, 90(2348), December 29, pp. 607-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.90.2348.607
Engs, Ruth C. 2003. The Progressive Era's Health Reform Movement: A Historical Dictionary. Westport, CT: Praeger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216001881
Eugenical News. 1924. “Annual Meeting of the Eugenics Research Association,” 9(7), July, p. 57.
Eugenics and the Family, volume I. Scientific Papers of the Second International Congress of Eugenics, Held at the American Museum of Natural History, New York, September 22-28, 1921. Baltimore. MD: Williams and Wilkins Company.
Field, James A. 1911. The Progress of Eugenics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 26(1): 1-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884524
Fiorito, Luca, and Cosma Orsi. 2017. “Survival Value and a Robust, Practical, Joyless Individualism: Thomas Nixon Carver, Social Justice, and Eugenics,” History of Political Economy, 49(3), September, pp. 469-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-4193045
Fiorito, Luca, and Massimiliano Vatiero. 2023. “On the Origins of American Business Leaders: Frank W. Taussig, Carl S. Joslyn, and the ‘Brain Trust’ of American Eugenics,” Journal of Economic Issues, 57(4), December, pp. 1178-1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2273140
Galton, Francis. 1869. Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry Into Its Laws and Consequences. London: Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13474-000
Grant, Madison. 1916. The Passing of the Great Race; or the Racial Basis of European History. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Grant, Madison. 1922. The Passing of the Great Race; or the Racial Basis of European History. Fourth Revised Edition with a Documentary Supplement. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Harvard University. 1899. The Harvard University Catalogue 1898-99. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Harvard University. 1901. The Harvard University Catalogue 1900-01. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Harvard University. 1910. The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University 1910-11. Second edition. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University.
Hook, Sidney. 1943. The Hero in History: A Study in Limitation and Possibility. New York: John Day Company.
Ireland, Alleyne. 1921. Democracy and the Human Equation. New York: E. P. Dutton and Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/213320
Johnson, George H. 1911. “Dr. Woods’s Application of the Histometric Method,” Science, New Series, 33(855), May 19, pp. 773-775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.33.855.773
Kellogg, Vernon L. 1914. “Heredity and ‘The Influence of Monarchs’,” American Naturalist, 48(568), April, pp. 255-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/279404
Kevles, Daniel J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Laughlin, Harry H. 1919. “The Relation of Eugenics to Other Sciences,” Eugenics Review, 11(2), July, pp. 53-64.
Leonard, Thomas C. 2016. Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77cqn
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1904. Thirty-ninth Annual Catalogue of the Officers and Students , with a Statement of the Courses of Instruction 1903-1904. Boston, MA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1904. Bulletin of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boston. Catalogue of the Officers and Students with a Statement of the Requirements for Admission and a Description of the Courses of Instruction. Vol. 40. December.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1907. Bulletin of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boston. Catalogue of the Officers and Students with a Statement of the Requirements for Admission and a Description of the Courses of Instruction. Vol. 43. December.
Morgan, Thomas M. 2024. Simple Liars, Damned Liars, Davenport the Expert, and Scientific Critics of Eugenics. Master's thesis, Harvard University Division of Continuing Education.
Nearing, Scott. 1913. Review of The Influence of Monarchs, by Frederick Adams Woods, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 50, November, pp. 293-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271621305000162
Nies, Betsy L. 2002. Eugenic Fantasies. Racial Ideology in the Literature and Popular Culture of the 1920's. New York: Routledge.
Okrent, Daniel. 2019. The Guarded Gate; Bigotry, Eugenics and the Law That Kept Two Generations of Jews, Italians, and Other European Immigrants Out of America. New York: Scribner.
Ottinger, Sebastian, and Nico Voigtländer. 2022. History’s Masters: The Effect of European Monarchs on State Performance. NBER Working Paper 28297. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Pastore, Nicholas. 1949. The Nature-Nurture Controversy. New York: King’s Crown Press, Columbia University.
Patten, Simon N. 1911. “The Method of Science: A Reply,” Science, New Series, 33(850), April 14, pp. 578-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.33.850.578
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. VIII: Reviews, Correspondence, and Bibliography. Edited by Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Problems in Eugenics. Papers communicated to the First International Eugenics Congress Held at the University of London, July 24th to 30th, 1912. Eugenics Education Society.
Rensing, Susan M. 2006. Feminist Eugenics in America: From Free Love to Birth Control, 1880–1930. Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota.
Rosen, Christine. 2004. Preaching Eugenics Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019515679X.001.0001
Schuster, Edgar. 1912. “The First International Eugenics Congress,” Eugenics Review, 4(3), October, pp. 223-256.
Simonton, Dean Keith. 1984. Genius, Creativity, and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674424753
Simonton, Dean Keith. 1995. “Personality and Intellectual Predictors of Leadership,” International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence. Edited by Donald H. Saklofske and Moshe Zeidner. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_34
Simonton, Dean Keith. 2016. “Reverse engineering genius: historiometric studies of superlative talent,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377(1), August, pp. 3-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13054
Spillman, W[illiam]. J[asper]. 1909. Review of Mental and Moral Heredity in Royalty: A Statistical Study of History and Sociology, by Frederick Adams Woods, American Anthropologist, New Series 11(3), July-September, pp. 509-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1909.11.3.02a00140
Thorndike, Edward L. 1914. Review of The Influence of Monarchs, by Frederick Adams Woods, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 11(3), January 29, pp. 81-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2012350
Yule, G. Udny. 1906. Review of Mental and Moral Heredity in Royalty, by F. A. Woods, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 69(4), December, pp. 759-762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2339275
Weatherly, Ulysses G. 1914. Review of The Influence of Monarchs: Steps in a New Science of History, by Frederick Adams Woods, American Economic Review, 4(1), March, pp. 120-122.
Who’s Who in America. 1928-29. Vol. 15. Chicago: A. N. Marquis Co.
Wiggam, Albert Edward. 1924. The Fruit of the Family Tree. Garden City, NY: Garden City Publishing Co., Inc.
Wills, James, ed. 1839. Lives of Illustrious and Distinguished Irishmen, from the Earliest Times to the Present Period, Arranged in Chronological Order, and Embodying a History of Ireland in the Lives of Irishmen. Volume I, part I. Dublin: Macgregor, Polson and Co.
Winslow, Charles-Edward A. 1914. Review of The Influence of Monarchs, by F. A Woods, Publications of the American Statistical Association, 14(105), March, pp. 76-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2965090
Wythe, Joseph H. 1889. The Physiology of the Soul. New York: Hunt and Eaton.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1902-1903. “Mental and Moral Heredity in Royalty,” Popular Science Monthly:
I. 61(4), August 1902, pp. 369-378
II. 61(5), September 1902, pp. 449-460
III. 61(6), October 1902, pp. 506-513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1902.61.jg.513
IV. 62(1), November 1902, pp. 76-84
V. 62(2), December 1902, pp. 167-182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.2168.182
VI. 62(3), January 1903, pp. 261-268
VII. 62(4), February 1903, pp. 316-322
VIII. 62(5), March 1903, pp. 423-428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/s9-XI.283.428d
IX. 62(6), April 1903, pp. 497-503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.2226.497
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1903. “Mendel’s Laws and Some Records in Rabbit Breeding,” Biometrika, 2(3), June, pp. 299-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/2.3.299
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1906. Mental and Moral Heredity in Royalty: A Statistical Study in History and Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Co. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1832891
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1908. “Recent Studies in Human Heredity,” The American Naturalist, 42(502), October, pp. 685-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/278994
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1909a. “Some Desiderata in the Science of Eugenics,” American Breeders’ Association, Volume V, Report of the Meeting Held at Columbia, Mo., January 6, 7 and 8, 1909, and for the Year Ending December 31, 1908. Washington, DC.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1909b. “American Men of Science and the Question of Heredity,” Science, New Series, 30(763), August 13, pp. 205-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.30.763.205
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1909c. “A New Name for a New Science,” Science, New Series, 30(777), November 19, pp. 703-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.30.777.703
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1910. “Laws of Diminishing Environmental Influence,” Popular Science Monthly, 76, April, pp. 313-336.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1911a. “Historiometry as an Exact Science,” Science, New Series, 33(850), April 14, pp. 568-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.33.850.568
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1911b. Review of Expansion of Races, by Charles Edward Woodruff, American Historical Review, 16(3), April, pp. 588-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/16.3.588
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1911c. “Separating Heredity from Environment,” American Breeders Magazine, 2(3), third quarter, pp. 194-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104575
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1912a. “Alternative Human Inheritance and Eugenics,” American Breeders Magazine, 3(1), first quarter, pp. 26-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/3.1.26
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1912b. “Alternative Heredity of Mental Traits,” The Mendel Journal, issue 3, September, pp. 5-16.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1912c. “Some Interrelations Between Eugenics and Historical Research,” Problems in Eugenics. Papers communicated to the First International Eugenics Congress Held at the University of London, July 24th to 30th, 1912. Eugenics Education Society.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1913a. The Influence of Monarchs: Steps in a New Science of History. New York: The Macmillan Co.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1913b. Heredity and the Hall of Fame,” Popular Science Monthly, 82(5), May, pp. 445-452.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1914. “The Racial Origin of Successful Americans,” Popular Science Monthly, 84(4), April, pp. 397-402.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1917. “Significant Evidence for Mental Heredity,” Journal of Heredity, 8(3), March, pp. 106-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111725
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1918a. Review of The Passing of the Great Race, by Madison Grant, Science, New Series, 48(1243), October 25, pp. 419-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.48.1243.419
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1918b. “Will Not Morality Necessarily Improve?” Journal of Heredity, 9(7), November, pp. 331-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111985
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1918c. “Kaiserism and Heredity,” Journal of Heredity, 9(8), December, pp. 348-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111989
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1919a. “Good Qualities Are Correlated,” Journal of Heredity, 10(2), February, pp. 84-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101888
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1919b. “The Racial Limitation of Bolshevism,” Journal of Heredity, 10(4), April, pp. 188-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101917
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1919c. “Genius of Theodore Roosevelt and His Place Among Historic Personalities,” Journal of Heredity, 10(7), October, pp. 300-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101935
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1919d. “Racial Origins and Honors of War,” Journal of Heredity, 10(7), October, p. 332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101940
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1919e. “A Definition of Heredity – ‘Nature vs. Nurture’ Not a Good Expression,” Journal of Heredity, 10(9), December, pp. 426-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101959
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1920a. “The Decline of Autocracy and Its Relation to Warfare,” Journal of Heredity, 11(1), January, pp. 33-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101965
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1920b. “Eugenics and Other Sciences,” Journal of Heredity, 11(2), February, pp. 77-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101972
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1921a. “Democracy and the Human Equation,” Journal of Heredity, 12(5), May, pp. 205-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a102086
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1921b. “What is there in Physiognomy? Journal of Heredity, 12 (7), August/September, pp. 301-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a102110
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1923a. “The Conification of Social Groups: Evidence from New England Families,” Eugenics and the Family, volume I. Scientific Papers of the Second International Congress of Eugenics, Held at the American Museum of Natural History, New York, September 22-28, 1921. Baltimore. MD: Williams and Wilkins Company.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1923b. “A Review of Reviews of Madison Grant’s Passing of the Great Race,” Journal of Heredity, 14(2), May, pp. 93-95.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1925. “War or Peace? The Biology of War,” Forum, 74(4), October, pp. 533-542.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1928a. “Successful Men Have Larger Families: Further Evidence for Mental Evolution,” Journal of Heredity, 19(6), June, pp. 271-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103000
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1928b. “Aristocracies and mental evolution or social ‘conification’,” Metron, 7(3), June, pp. 121-137.
Woods, Frederick Adams. 1928c. “Perpetuation of Old Families: Inheritance of Parental Instincts and ‘Social Conification,” Journal of Heredity, 19(9), September, pp. 387-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103029
Woods, Frederick Adams and Alexander Baltzly. 1915. Is War Diminishing? A Study of the Prevalence of War in Europe from 1450 to the Present Day. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Woods, Frederick A., Meyer, Adolph, and Charles B. Davenport. 1914. Studies in Human Heredity. Journal of Heredity, 5(12): 547–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a107793
Formato
Licencia
La revista Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, para fomentar el intercambio global del conocimiento, facilita el acceso sin restricciones a sus contenidos desde el momento de su publicación en la presente edición electrónica, y por eso es una revista de acceso abierto. Los originales publicados en esta revista son propiedad de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid y es obligatorio citar su procedencia en cualquier reproducción total o parcial. Todos los contenidos se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario. Puede consultar la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia.
La revista Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought no cobra por tasas por envío de trabajos, ni tampoco cuotas por la publicación de sus artículos.






