Communicative reaction or proaction: A diachronic analysis of parliamentary interventions on migration

Keywords: parlamentary discourse, refugees, diachrony, quantitative methodology, qualitative methodology, corpora

Abstract

From the perspective of corpus linguistics, this paper proposes a quantitative/qualitative methodology to perform a critical and diachronic análisis of parliamentary communication on migratory phenomena (specifically, about refugees). After the introduction (in section 1), section 2 describes the basic concepts by Zapata-Barrero and Wodak, with which the analytical method is constructed. Section 3 describes the texts, tools and phases of the article. In section 4, the model is tested by examining the collocations around the node REFUG* in the course of three historical phases of the Spanish Congress of Deputies. The article concludes by confirming the effectiveness of the proposed analytical model.

Author Biography

María Calzada Pérez, Jaume I University

María Calzada Pérez es catedrática de Traducción en la Universitat Jaume I (Castellón). Se especializa en el estudio (cualitativo y cuantitativo) de comunicación multilingüe/monolingüe y sus efectos ideológicos. Coordinadora del grupo European Comparable and Parallel Corpora, ha publicado y editados 7 libros (nacionales e internacionales) y posee una centena de artículos en revistas indexadas como Journal of Intercultural Communication; Journal of Language and Politics; Pragmatics; Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada.

View Citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2024-05-29
How to Cite
Calzada Pérez, M. (2024). Communicative reaction or proaction: A diachronic analysis of parliamentary interventions on migration. Historia Y Comunicación Social, 29(1), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.93392