The Double Alexander the Great?
Keywords:
Double, Alexander III of Macedonia, Hephaistion, Aristotle, ancient theory of friendship, Curtius, European art, Louis XIV, historical romance, movie
Abstract
On the basis of an ancient tradition on their visit to the captured royal family of the Persian great king, Hephaistion, the closest friend and confidant of Alexander the Great, was depicted in European art of the Renaissance and Baroque as his look-alike. The ancient background was Aristotle’s theories on friendship. During the 20th and 21st centuries the image of the doubled Alexander received further treatment. Hephaistion was shown as a mere shadow of Alexander and opportunist while Alexander was depicted as a true philosopher king and hero or as a person at odds with himself.Format
Crossmark
How to Cite
Müller, S. (2011). The Double Alexander the Great? Amaltea. Revista de Mitocrítica, 3, 115-138. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_AMAL.2011.v3.37538
Section
Articles | Thematic Issue
License
Amaltea. Revista de mitocrítica is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access."Full-text articles published in Amaltea. Revista de mitocrítica are open-access and published under a CreativeCommons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en. Reproduction, distribution or public communication of these articles with commercial purposes requires the Editor’s prior written. Redistribution for academic purposes is permitted, provided that the source and authorship are properly acknowledged, and that the journal is credited with the first publication, by adding a link to the journal's official URL. If available, the DOI of the article in question should also be included.
