Intricate Readings: Machiavelli, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas

  • Carlo Ginzburg Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (Italia)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/RPUB.60847
Keywords: Machiavelli, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Scioppius, etic and emic.

Abstract

The rehabilitation of the Machiavelli thought that Kaspar Schopper tried in his Paideia policies where he affirmed that Machiavelli was just repeating arguments that Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas had already stated before, allows us to recognize the intricate relationship among the different readings that give rise to the composition of this defense. An appropriate contextualization of such different readings that pointed the right distance between etic and emic approaches, perhaps could allow us to know better the real meaning of Machiavellian thought.
View Citations

Format

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2018-07-06
How to Cite
Intricate Readings: Machiavelli, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas (C. Ginzburg, Trans.). (2018). Res Publica. Revista de Historia de Las Ideas Políticas, 21(2), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.5209/RPUB.60847
Issue
Vol. 21 No. 2 (2018)
Section
Artículos

License

In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.