LA AMBIVALENCIA DE LOS CONCEPTOS. OBSERVACIONES ACERCA DE ALGUNAS RELACIONES ENTRE BEGRIFFSGESCHICHTE E HISTORIOGRAFÍA DEL DISCURSO POLÍTICO
Abstract
This essay deals with the ambivalence and wealth of concepts in general, and with the political concepts in particular. Modern political concepts are complex and controversial, being the formulation of their meaning an important requirement to solve the problems of present age. This essay collates the diferences and similarities of the History of Concepts and the historiography of political discourse, and hints the aporetical nature of the political concepts.Format
Crossmark
How to Cite
LA AMBIVALENCIA DE LOS CONCEPTOS. OBSERVACIONES ACERCA DE ALGUNAS RELACIONES ENTRE BEGRIFFSGESCHICHTE E HISTORIOGRAFÍA DEL DISCURSO POLÍTICO (M. Merlo, Trans.). (2008). Res Publica. Revista de Historia de Las Ideas Políticas, 1. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RPUB/article/view/45877
Section
Artículos
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
