Attributions of ideas and constituent process in Chile: qualitative study on consensus building in times of uncertainty
Abstract
This article aims to analyze how individuals attribute ideas and political preferences to other groups within Chilean society. In particular, we focus on attitudes towards constitutional processes and their role in political consensus-building. Through exploratory qualitative research, we conducted nine focus groups with individuals from different social classes in various regions of the country (North, Central, and South Chile), probing how people in Chilean society attribute positions on different contentious dimensions to others. Through a vignette classification exercise, we identified the main mechanisms for making these attributions to third parties. Based on this analysis, we highlight the role of voting as a central criterion in how people perceive others' political ideas, considering social class and ethnicity as additional determinants. We discuss the implications of this finding for the construction of social and political consensus.
Format
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Política y Sociedad is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.





