Transnistria: origins, evolution, consequences and future scenarios of a de facto state
- José Ángel López Jiménez Universidad Pontificia Comillas (España) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5787-5532
Abstract
This article analyzes a model of conflict in the former Soviet space whose origin is located in the final period of the Soviet Union. The prolongation of the independent Republic of Moldova during the state building process —with a war conflict in 1992— as well as the absence of a definitive resolution from the political-diplomatic point of view and the multiple support given by Russia to the enclave secessionist ended with its conversion into a de facto State. It is not an isolated phenomenon in this vast geopolitical area, which Russia has made its essential sphere of interest. However, it presents certain particularities that reach the construction, consolidation or destruction of ethnic national identities —including the majority in the new State— without forgetting the nature of the conflict itself. The consequences derived from Russia´s continued aggression against Ukraine since 2014 can lead to unpredictable scenarios around Transnistria: from the expansion of the Kremlin´s territorial objectives to the final unblocking of the conflict towards any possible scenario, in a regional context of extreme insecurity.
References
Aksenova, M. e I. Marchuk (2018): “Reinventing or rediscovering international law? The Russian Constitutional Court’s uneasy dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(4), pp. 1322–1346. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy088
Baar, V. y D. Jakubek (2017): “Divided national identity in Moldova”, Journal of Nationalism Memory&Language Politics, 11(1), pp. 58-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jnmlp-2017-0004
Bacova, V. (1998): “The construction of national identity-on primordialism and instrumentalism”, Human Affairs, 8(1), pp. 29-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-1998-080104
Baqués Quesada, J. (2021): De las Guerras Híbridas a la Zona Gris. La Metamorfosis de los Conflictos en el Siglo XXI, Madrid, Uned.
Beissinger, M. (2009): “Nationalism and the collapse of Soviet communism”, Contemporary European History, 18(3), pp. 331-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777309005074
Blakkisrud, H. y P. Kolstø (2011): “From secessionist conflict toward a functioning state: processes of state-and nation-building in Transnistria”, Post-Soviet Affairs, 27(2), pp.178-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.27.2.178
Bremmer, I. (1993): “Reasserting soviet nationalities theory”, en I. Bremmer y R. Taras, eds., Nations, Politics in the Soviet Successor States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-28.
Bruchis, M. (1984): “The language policy of the CPSU and the linguistic situation in Soviet Moldavia”, Soviet Studies, 36 (1), pp.108-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668138408411516
Budurina, C. (2022): “The Foreign Policy of the Republic of Moldova in the Context of New Geopolitical Realities”, en VV. AA., Teoria și practica administrării publice, Ediţia 26, Chişinău, pp. 150-155.
Büscher, K. (1998): “Moldavia after the Parliamentary elections: A second chance for reform”, Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, 1(3), pp. 69-79.
Cebotari, S. y I. Gutu (2015): “Elements of the hybrid war in the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine”, en V. Teosa y C. Morari, eds., Moldovan peace dialogues: Societal integration accommodation policies and strategies, from an academic perspective, Chisinau, CEP USM, pp. 126-133.
Chinn, J. y S. Roper (1995): “Ethnic Mobilization and Reactive Nationalism: The Case of Moldova”, Nationalities Papers, 23(2), pp. 291-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905999508408378
Chinn, J. y S. Roper (1998): “Territorial Autonomy in Gagauzia”, Nationalities Papers, 26 (1), pp. 87-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905999808408552
Clover, Ch. (2016): Black Wind,White Snow: The Rise of Russia´s New Nationalism, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Concepto de Política Exterior de Rusia (2016): Aprobado por Decreto del Presidente de la Federación de Rusia el 30 de noviembre. Disponible en: https://interkomitet.com/foreign-policy/basic-documents/foreign-policy-concept-of-the-russian-federation-approved-by-president-of-the-russian-federation-vladimir-putin-on-november-30-2016/ [Consulta: 10 de octubre de 2023]. Actualizado por el Decreto del Presidente de la Federación de Rusia el 31 de marzo de 2023. Disponible en: https://mid.ru/es/foreign_policy/official_documents/1860586/ [Consulta: 10 de octubre de 2023].
Crowther, W. (1997): “The Politics of Democratization in Post-communist Moldavia”, en K. Dawisha y B. Parrott, eds., Democratic changes and authoritarian reactions in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldavia, Londres, Cambridge University Press, pp. 289-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559211.008
Crowther, W. (1998): “Ethnic Politics and the Post-Communist Transition in Moldova”, Nationalities Papers, 26(1), pp. 147-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905999808408555
Deletant, D. (1990): “Language policy and linguistic trends in Soviet Moldavia”, en M. Kirkwood, ed., Language planning in the Soviet Union, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.189-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20301-7_10
Dima, N. (1991): From Moldavia to Moldavia, Nueva York, Columbia University Press.
Dusacova, N. (2013): “Ethnic and civic identity in the Republic of Moldavia: The view of occidental experts”, Revista de Etnologie si Culturologie, 13-14, pp.102-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.21137
Dyer, D. y B. Comrie (1996): Studies in Moldavian: History, Culture, Language and Contemporary Politics of the People of Moldavia, Nueva York, Columbia University Press.
Fabian, S. (2019): “The Russian hybrid warfare strategy—Neither Russian nor strategy”, Defense and Security Analysis, 35(3), pp. 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1640424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1640424
Fowkes, B. (1997): The Disintegration of the Soviet Union. A Study in the rise and triumph of nationalism, Londres, Macmillan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377462
Gorenburg D. (2001): “Nationalism for Masses: Popular Support for Nationalism in Russia’s Ethnic Republics”, Europe-Asia Studies, 53(1), pp. 73-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130124664
Hale, H. (2004): “Divided we stand: Institutional sources of ethnofederal state survival and collapse”, World politics, 56(2), pp. 165-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2004.0011
Haynes, R. ed., (2003): Moldavia, Besarabia, Transnistria, Londres, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London.
Hegarty, T. (2001): “The Politics of Language in Moldavia”, en C. O´Reilly, ed., Language, Ethnicity and the State, (2), Minority Languages in Eastern Europe post-1989, Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 123-154.
Hugues, J. (2001): “Chechnya: the causes of a protracted post-soviet conflict”, Civil Wars, 4(4), pp. 11-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698240108402486
Iavorschi, A. (2012): “The Problem of National Identity in the Republic of Moldova: Moldovanism and Romanianism”, Oikonomia: Journal of Ethics and Social Sciences, 3, pp. 33-37.
Ihrig, S. (2009): “Moldavian Nightmares, or: “Historiographic Deadlock at Birth” History, identity, and history teaching in the Republic of Moldavia, 1991 – 2008”, en A. Dimou, ed.,“Transition” and the Politics of History Education in Southeast Europe, Göttingen, V&R Unipress, pp. 357-396.
Iordachi, C. (2004): “Dual Citizenship and Policies toward kin Minorities in East Central Europe: A Comparison between Hungary, Romania and the Republic of Moldavia”, en Z. Kantor, B. Majtényi, O. Ieda, B. Vizi e I. Halász, eds., The Hungarian Status Law: Nation Building and/or Minority Protection, Sapporo, Hokaido University, pp. 239-269.
Istomin, I. (2015): “Ukraine is intensifying the Transnistria conflict”, Russian International Affairs Council, 3 de agosto. Disponible en: https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/ukraine-is-intensifying-the-transnistria-conflict/[Consulta: 26 de septiembre de 2023].
Johansson, A. (2011): Dissenting Democrats. Nation and Democracy in the Republic of Moldova, Estocolmo, Stockholm University.
Jordán, J. (2018): “El conflicto internacional en la zona gris: una propuesta teórica desde la perspectiva del realismo ofensivo”, Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 48, pp. 129-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.48.05
Kanet, R. (2012): “The return of imperial Russia”, en M. Sussex, ed., Conflict in the former USSR, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980565.003
King, Ch. (1994): “Moldavian identity and the politics of Pan-Romanianism”, Slavic Review, 53(2), pp. 345-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2501297
King, Ch. (1995): “Eurasia Letter: Moldova with a Russian Face”, Foreign Policy, 97, pp. 106-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1149443
Kolossov, V. y J. O’Loughlin (1998): “Pseudo‐states as Harbingers of a new geopolitics: the example of the trans‐Dniester Moldovan republic (TMR)”, Geopolitics, 3(1), pp. 151-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650049808407612
Kolstø, P., A. Edemsky, A. y N. Kalashnikova (1993): “The Dniester conflict: Between irredentism and separatism”, Europe-Asia Studies, 45(6), pp. 973-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139308412137
Kolstø, P. (2011): “Beyond Russia, becoming local: Trajectories of adaption to the fall of the Soviet Union among ethnic Russians in the former Soviet Republics”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2(2), pp. 153-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2011.03.006
Kolsto, P. (2018): “The Ethnification of Russian Nationalism”, en P. Kolsto y H. Blakkisrud, eds., The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism, 2000-15, Edimburgo, Edinburgh University Press, pp. 18-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474410427.003.0002
Kolstø, P. y A. Malgin (1998): “The Transnistrian republic: a case of politicized regionalism”, Nationalities Papers, 26(1), pp. 103–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905999808408553
Kosienkowski, M. (2019): “The patron-client relationship between Russia and Transnistria”, en T. Hoch y V. Kopečk, eds., De facto states in Eurasia, Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 183-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244049-14
Kotkin, S. (2001): Armageddon averted: The Soviet collapse, 1970-2000, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kuzio, T. (2002): “History, Memory and Nation Building in the Post-Soviet Colonial Space”, Nationalities Papers, 30(2), pp. 241-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905990220140649
Laitin, D. (1998): Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad, Londres, Cornell University Press.
Laruelle, M. (2004): “The Two faces of Contemporary Eurasianism. An Imperial Version of the Russian Nationalism”, Nationalities Papers 32(1), pp. 115-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0090599042000186197
López Jiménez, J. A. (1999): “Las relaciones interétnicas en la Moldavia postsoviética: Gagauzia y Transnistria (1990-1994)”, Cuadernos de la Cátedra Fadrique Furió Ceriol, 28-29, pp. 23-50.
López Jiménez, J. A. (2019): “The dissolution of the Soviet Union and complex state construction processes. Two differentiated secession models in the Republic of Moldavia: Gagauzia and Transnistria”, Spanish Yearbook of International Law, 22, pp. 403-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17103/sybil.22.20
López Jiménez, J. A. (2020):“El factor nacional en la implosión de la Unión Soviética: El caso moldavo (1989-1994)”, en A. Mayayo, J. M. Rúa y A. Segura, eds., Centenari de la revolució russa, Barcelona, Edicions Universitat de Barcelona, pp. 365-376.
López Jiménez, J. A. (2021): “La OSCE y el Espacio Post-Soviético: Treinta años de Prevención y Resolución de Conflictos. Una Valoración Crítica”, Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 41, pp. 1-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.41.10
Lutterjohann, N. (2023): “The depth of the deadlock? Underlying themes in the Georgian-Abkhaz and Moldovan-Transnistrian Post-Soviet conflicts”, National Identities 25(1), pp. 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2022.2050197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2022.2050197
Lynch, D. (2002): “Separatist states and post-Soviet conflicts”, International Affairs, 78(4), pp. 831-848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00282
Marsili, M. (2021): “The Russian Influence Strategy in Its Contested Neighbourhood”, en H. Mölder, V. Sazonov, A. Chochia, T. Kerikmäe, eds., The Russian Federation in Global Knowledge Warfare. Contributions to International Relations, Nueva York, Springer, pp. 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73955-3_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73955-3_8
Minakov, M. (2018): Development and Dystopia. Studies in Post-Soviet Ukraine and Eastern Europe, Stuttgart, Ibidem-Verlag.
Neukirch, C. (2001): “Russia and the OSCE: The Influence of Interested Third and Disinterested Fourth Parties on the Conflicts in Estonia and Moldova”, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 2. Disponible en: https://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/redakteure/publications/JEMIE_Datens%C3%A4tze/JEMIE07Neukirch1 1-07-01.pdf [Consulta: 26 de septiembre de 2023].
O’Loughlin, J., V. Kolossov, y G. Toal (2014): “Inside the post-Soviet de facto states: a comparison of attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(5), pp. 423-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2015.1012644
Pacher, A. (2020): “Transnistria´s Order of Friendship: Legitimacy through Diplomatic Practice”, Europe-Asia Studies, 72(7), pp. 1209-1231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1722799
Pain, E. (2016): “The imperial syndrome and its influence on Russian nationalism”, en P. Kolsto y H. Blakkisrud, eds., The new Russian nationalism, Edimburgo, Edinburg University Press, pp. 46-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474410427.003.0003
Patlis, L. (2018): “The Discourse on Asymmetrical Devolution in Moldova: Gagauzia and Transnistria in Focus”, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 17(3), pp. 87-111.
Potter, B. (2022): “Unrecognized Republic, Recognizable Consequences: Russian Troops in 'Frozen' Transnistria”, Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 13(1), pp. 168-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21140/mcuj.2022SIstratcul010
Programa del Partido de Acción y Solidaridad (2019): Disponible en: https://unpaspentru.md/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/PROGRAM_PAS_EN.pdf [Consulta: 26 de septiembre de 2023].
Protsyk, O. (2012): “Gagauz Autonomy in Moldavia: The Real and the Virtual in Post-Soviet State design”, en M. Weller y K. Nobbs, eds., Asymmetric Autonomy and the Settlement of Ethnic Conflicts, Filadelfia, University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 231-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt3fhcx2.13
Roeder, Ph. (1991): “Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization”, World Politics, 43(2), pp. 196-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010471
Roper, S. (2001): “Regionalism in Moldova: The Case of Transnistria and Gagauzia”, Regional & Federal Studies, 11(3), pp. 101-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714004699
Roper, S. (2005): “The Politicization of Education: Identity formation in Moldavia and Transnistria”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38(4), pp. 501-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.09.003
Roshwald, A. (2015): “Civic and ethnic nationalism”, en The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism, pp.1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663202.wberen436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663202.wberen436
Salomón González, M. (2001): “La Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales en los albores del siglo XXI: diálogo, disidencias, aproximaciones”, Revista Cidob d´Afers Internacionals, 56, pp. 7-52.
Sakwa, R. (2021): “Greater Russia: Is Moscow out to Subvert the West?", International Politics, 58, pp. 334-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00258-0
Sato, K. (2009): “Mobilization of non-titular ethnicities during the last years of the Soviet Union: Gagauzia, Transnistria, and the Lithuanian poles”, Acta Slavica Iaponica, (26), pp. 141-157.
Sergunin, A. (2016): Explaining Russian Foreign Policy Behavior. Theory and Practice, Stuttgart, Ibidem-Verlag.
Smith, B. (2013): “Separatist conflict in the former Soviet Union and beyond: How different was communism?”, World Politics, 65(2), pp. 350-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887113000087
Solchanyk, R. (2019): “Ukraine, Belorussia, and Moldavia: Imperial integration, Russification, and the struggle for national survival”, en L. Hajda y M. Beissinger, eds., The nationalities factor in Soviet politics and society, Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 175-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429313004-8
Telenko, O. y Y. Prysiazhniuk (2021): “Cursory Viewpoint on Transnistria as the Focus of the Russian Federation Policy”, Przegląd Strategiczny, 14, pp. 215-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2021.1.13
Tishkov, V. (1997): Ethnicity, nationalism and conflict in and after the Soviet Union: The mind aflame, Nueva York, Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279427
Traverso, E. y M. Löwy (1990): “The marxist approach to the national question: A critique of Nimni´s interpretation”, Science & Society, 54(2), pp. 132-146.
Troebst, S. (2003): “We Are Transnistrians!", Post-Soviet Identity Management in the Dniester Valley”, Ab Imperio, 2003 (1), pp. 437-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2003.0056
Van Meurs, W. P. (1994): The Bessarabian question in communist historiography. Nationalist and communist politics and history writing, Nueva York, Columbia University Press.
Van Meurs, W. P. (1998): “Carving a Moldavian Identity out of History”, Nationalities Papers, 26(1), pp. 39-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905999808408549
Van Meurs, W. P. (2015): “Moldavia: Nested Cases of Belated Nation-building”, Revue D´Études Comparatives Est-Ouest, 46, pp. 185-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4074/S0338059915001084
Wodak, R., R. De Cilia, M. Reisigl y K. Liebhart, eds., (2009): The discursive construction of national identity, Edimburgo, Edinburgh University Press.
Yusupova, G. (2018): “Cultural nationalism and everyday resistance in an iliberal nationalising state: ethnic minority nationalism in Russia”, Nations and Nationalism, 24(3), pp. 624-647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12366
Zimmermann, K. (2008): “Política lingüística e identidad: Una visión constructivista”, en K. Süselbeck, U. Mühlschlegel y P. Masson, coords., Lengua, Nación e Identidad, Madrid, Iberoamericana Editorial Vervuert, pp. 21-42.
Format
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Política y Sociedad is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.






