Kant and the Duty to Stay in the State of Nature
- Norbert Slenzok University of Zielona Góra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-8416
- Patryk Trzcionka University of Silesia in Katowice https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1709-351X
Resumo
The paper tackles the question as to whether Kant has successfully substantiated his claim that there exists a moral and juridical duty to leave the state of nature. Our thesis is that he has not. In the first step, it is demonstrated that Kant’s concept of provisional ownership is a logical impossibility. Thus, property rights themselves cannot generate the duty to submit to the state. The only way to argue for the duty to exit statelessness that the Kantian is left with is therefore to conceive of that duty as implied directly by the right to freedom. Yet, one may plausibly argue that at the conceptual level, public law runs afoul of Kant’s notion of freedom to a greater degree than private law does. Therefore, in virtue of the innate right to freedom, a prima facie duty arises to stay in the state of nature.
Referências
Achenwall, G. (2020), Natural Law: A Translation of the Textbook for Kant’s Lectures on Legal and Political Philosophy, Ed. P. Kleinweld, trans. C. Vermeulen, London-New York, Bloomsbury Academic.
Barnett, R.E. (2014), The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, J.M. (1975), The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan, The University of Chicago Press: Chicago-London.
Buchanan, J.M., Tullock G. (1965), The Calculus of Consent. The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Presss.
Buchner, W. (1996), Kant - państwo i prawo, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Aureus.
Byrd, B.S., Hruschka, J. (2010), Kant’s Doctrine of Right. A Commentary, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712050
Christmas, B. (2021), “Against Kantian Statism”, The Journal of Politics no. 83 (4), pp. 1721-1733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/711556
Christmas, B. (2025), “Property, Authority, and Unavoidable Unilateralism”, Law & Philosophy, forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5200383 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5200383 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5200383
Demsetz, H. (1969), “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint”, The Journal of Law & Economics, Apr., 1969, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Apr., 1969), pp. 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466657
Flikschuh, K. (2022), “Innate right in Kant—A critical reading”, European Journal of Philosophy, 30(2), pp. 823-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12707
Fuller, L. (1969), The Morality of Law. Revised Edition, Yale University Press: New Haven and London.
Ellis, E. (2008), Provisional Politics. Kantian Arguments in Policy Contexts, New Haven and London: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300125221.001.0001
Gregor, M. J. (1962), Laws of Freedom. A Study of Kant’s Method od Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten, New York: Barnes and Noble.
Gregory, M.L. (2021), “Kant’s Naturrecht Feyerabend, Achenwall, and the Role of the State”, Kant Yearbook 13 (1), pp. 49-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2021-0003
Guyer, P. (2000), Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness, Cambridge University Press: Edinburgh-New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173339
Hart, H. (2001), Essays on Bentham. Jurisprudence and Political Theory, Clarendon Press: Oxford.
Hasnas, J. (2003), “Reflections on the Minimal State”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X03002001426
Hasnas, J. (2008), “The Obviousness of Anarchy”, In: R.T. Long. T..R. Machan (ed.), Anarchism/Minarchism, Is Government Part of a Free Country?, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Hayek, F.A. (1982), Law, Legislation, and Liberty. A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, London: Routledge.
Hodgson, L-P. (2010), “Kant on Property Rights and the State”, Kantian Review, 15, pp. 57-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415400002375
Höffe, O. (2022), Immanuel Kant, C.H. Beck.
Hohfeld, W. (1919), Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Essays, New Haven-London.
Honoré, A.M. (1993), “Ownership”, In: Patricia Smith (ed.), The Nature and Process of Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoppe, H-H. (2006), The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, Auburn, Ala: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Hoppe, H-H. (2021), The Great Fiction. Property, Economy, Society, and the Politics of Decline, Auburn, Ala: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Huemer, M. (2013), The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kant, I. (1968), Kant's Political Writings, Edit. Raymond Geuss, Quentin Skinner, Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought.
Kant, I. (1991), The Metaphysics of Morals, Trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge-New York-Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1998), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Trans. M. Gregor, Camridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809590
Kant, I. (2016), Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, Trans. F. Rauscher, K.R. Westphal, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139046237
Kinsella, N. S. (1995), “Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society”, Journal of Libertarian Studies 11:2, pp. 132-181.
Kersting, W. (1992), “Politics, Freedom, and Order. Kant’s Political Philosophy”, In: P. Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521365872.012
Kramer, M. (2002), “Rights Without Trimmings”, In: M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner, A Debate Over Rights. Philosophical Inquiries, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 7-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.003.0002
Kuznicki, J. (2016), “Kantianism”, In: A.R. Powell, G. Babcock (eds.), Arguments for Liberty, Washington DC: Cato Institute.
Lakatos, I. (1981), “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions”, In: E. Hacking (ed.), Scientific Revolutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leoni, B. (1972), Freedom and the Law, Los Angeles: Nash Publishing.
Linsbichler, A. (2017), Was Ludwig von Mises a Conventionalist? A New Analysis of the Epistemology of the Austrian School of Economics, Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46170-0
Locke, J. (1988), Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810268
Long, R.T. (2008), “Market Anarchism as Constitutionalism”, In: R.T. Long, T..R. Machan (eds), Anarchism/Minarchism, Is Government Part of a Free Country?, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Long, R.T. & Machan T. (eds). 2008, Anarchism/Minarchism. Is Government Part of a Free Country?, Aldershot UK, Burlington USA: Ashgate.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, W.W. Norton & Co.
Nozick, R. (1999), Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Blackwell: Oxford UK, Cambridge USA.
Nye, J.S. (2007), Understanding Global Conflicts. An Introduction to Theory and History, Boston, MA: Pearson.
Olson, M. (1971), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Ripstein, A. (2009), Freedom and Force. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA – London: Harvard University Press.
Robbins, L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: MacMillan.
Rothbard, M.N. (1998), The Ethics of Liberty, New York: New York University Press.
Rothbard, M.N. (2000), The Irrepressible Rothbard. The Rothbard-Rockwell Report Essays of Murray N. Rothbard, Burlingame, CA: The Center for Libertarian Studies.
Sangiovanni, A. (2012), Can the Innate Right to Freedom Alone Ground a System of Public and Private Rights?, European Journal of Philosophy, 20(3), pp. 460-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00555.x
Simmonds, N.E. (2002), “Rights at the Cutting Edge”, In: M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner, A Debate Over Rights. Philosophical Inquiries, New York: Oxford University Press; pp. 113-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.003.0003
Steiner, H. (1994), An Essay on Rights, Blackwell: Oxford UK and Cambridge USA.
Steiner, H. (2002), “Working Rights.” In: M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner, A Debate Over Rights. Philosophical Inquiries, New York: Oxford University Press; pp. 233-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.003.0004
Stilz, A. (2014), “Provisional Rights and Non-state Peoples”, In: Kant and Colonialism, Oxford, edited by Katrin Flikschuh and Lea Ypi, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669622.003.0009
Stone, M. J., Hasan, R. (2022), What Is Provisional Right?, Philosophical Review, 131(1); pp. 51-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-9415141
Stringham, E. (2015), Private Governance. Creating Order in Economic and Social Life, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199365166.001.0001
Stringham, E. (ed.). 2018, Anarchy, State, and Public Choice. Advanced Studies in Political Economy. Arlington VA: Mercatus Center.
Szczepański, J. (2017), Filozofia polityczna Immanuela Kanta, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Szczepański, J. (2019), Metamorfoza: Immanuel Kant o przemianie politycznej w ujęciu teleologicznym, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Thomas, W. R. (2008), “Objectivism against Anarchy”, In: Long, R.T. & Machan T. (eds), Anarchism/Minarchism. Is Government Part of a Free Country? Aldershot UK, Burlington USA: Ashgate.
Thorpe, L., Demirli, S. (2024), Three aspects of Kantian Autonomy: Independence, Self-Determination and Citizenship. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 20, pp. 41-49, https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.95646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.95646
Thrasher, J. (2019), “Self-ownership as personal sovereignty”, Social Philosophy & Policy, 36(2), pp. 116–133, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052519000396 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052519000396
Von Savigny, F. C. (1979), Treatise on Possession; or, the Jus Possessionis of the Civil Law, Westport: Hyperion Press.
Van der Vossen, B. (2015), “Imposing Duties and Original Appropriation”, Journal of Political Philosophy 23:64-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12029
Varden, H. (2008), “Kant's Non-Voluntarist Conception of Political Obligations: Why Justice is Impossible in the State of Nature”, Kantian Review, Vol. 13, pp. 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415400001217
Varden, H. (2010), “Kant’s Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy – How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the ‘Doctrine of Right’ ”, Kant Studien 101, pp. 331-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2010.021
Verhaegh, M. (2004), “Kant and Property Rights”, The Journal of Libertarian Studies 18, no. 3.
Weber, M. (2004), The Vocation Lectures: Science as a Vocation, Politics as a Vocation. Trans. R. Livingstone, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Williams, H. (1977), “Kant’s Concept of Property”, The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 106, pp. 32-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2218926
Waldron, J. (1996), “Kant’s Legal Positivism.” Harvard Law Review 109:1535-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1342024
Wood, A. (2007), Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809651
Wood, A. (2014), The Free Development of Each. Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685530.001.0001
##submission.format##
##submission.crossmark##
