Universalidad subjetiva y objetiva . Una mirada a los Prolegómenos desde la Crítica de la facultad de juzgar

Rafael Reyna

doi:10.5209/kant.95576

Rafael Reyna University of Malaga https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7115-8233

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.95576

Keywords: Judgment of experience, judgment of perception, judgment of taste, validity

Agencies: “Esquematismo, teoría de las categorías y mereología en la filosofía kantiana: una perspectiva fenomenológico-hermenéutica” PID2020 115142GA-I00, “Edición y traducción al español de las Críticas de Immanuel Kant” PID2022-142190NB-I00 , MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ , FEDER Una manera de hacer Europa

Abstract

This article explores the distinction between the universal validity of judgments of experience, as it appears in the Prolegomena, in relation to the concept of subjective universal validity in the Critique of Judgment. In doing so, it is expected to show some systematic aspects of Kant’s treatment of both notions. The hermeneutical basis of this approach is to be found in Wieland’s seminal work, Urteil und Gefühl. This paper also seeks to share the originality and depth of his proposal.

##submission.viewcitations##