https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/issue/feed Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas 2025-12-11T08:34:09+00:00 Juan Manuel Forte ingenium@filos.ucm.es Open Journal Systems <p><em>Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas</em> (ISSN-e 1989-3663) is a digital journal devoted to the history and analysis of modern thought, plus any related contemporary questions and debates. The journal's focus is the intellectual space that begins with the Renaissance and lasts until the death of Hegel as the end of modern philosophy. The predominant lines of research include: humanism and Erasmism; the first modernity and the formation and structure of philosophical systems; the categories of Renaissance, Baroque and Enlightenment; modern political theory and political philosophy; Aristotelianism and late scholasticism; Spanish-American thinking from the period; and finally, the problems of methodology and hermeneutics in the field of the history of ideas, including a discussion on historiography categories in the field.</p> https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/97947 Borja García Ferrer, Baltasar Gracián: Filósofo de la Vida Humana (prólogo de José Luis Villacañas). Madrid: Guillermo Escolar Editor, 2023, págs. 211 2025-12-11T08:34:07+00:00 Javier Miguel Hostaled Cortés hostcort@gmail.com 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/104476 Eugenia Mattei y Leandro Losada (coords.) (2024). Maquiavelo, el pueblo y el populismo: historia, teoría política y debates interpretativos. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires, 339 páginas. 2025-08-18T14:28:32+00:00 Patricio López Camelo plopezcamelo@gmail.com <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">El volumen colectivo </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Maquiavelo, el pueblo y el populismo</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> reúne una serie de ensayos que abordan de forma rigurosa y multidisciplinaria las complejas intersecciones entre el pensamiento de Nicolás Maquiavelo y el fenómeno del populismo en la teoría política contemporánea. Coordinado por Eugenia Mattei y Leandro Losada, el libro representa una valiosa contribución a los debates actuales sobre republicanismo, democracia y conflicto.</span></p> 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/100846 Villar Ezcurra, Alicia (2024). Blaise Pascal: Pensar sin límites. Estudios sobre su pensamiento y obra. Universidad Pontificia de Comillas, 346 páginas. 2025-07-16T16:44:10+00:00 David Moral Escobar dmoral10@ucm.es 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/104053 Bento, António (2022): Espinosa e o Estado dos Hebreus. Ensaios de filosofía política. Lisboa: Documenta, 368 páginas. 2025-07-16T16:18:33+00:00 Héctor Quintela González hquintel@ucm.es 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/99129 The concept of anima mundi in the Renaissance: Nicholas of Cusa, Marsilio Ficino and Giordano Bruno 2025-12-11T08:34:01+00:00 Agustín Bianchi agustinbianchi19@gmail.com <p>The purpose of this article is to study the treatment of the concept of <em>anima mundi</em> in three central figures of Renaissance philosophy: Nicholas of Cusa, Marsilio Ficino, and Giordano Bruno. To achieve this, I analyze Cusa’s conception of <em>anima mundi</em> in his works <em>De docta ignorantia</em> II (1440) and <em>Idiota. De mente</em> (1450). Subsequently, I study the place of the World Soul in Ficinian ontology in selected passages of works such as <em>De amore</em> (1469), <em>Theologia platonica</em> (1482) and the third book of <em>De vita triplici</em> (1489). Finally, I examine the reception of the Platonic concept of <em>anima mundi</em> in the natural philosophy of Giordano Bruno, mainly from the reading of <em>De la causa, principio et Uno</em> (1584) and <em>Lampas triginta statuarum</em> (1586), complementing it when relevant by considerations from other works in his Italian and Latin production. The aim is to analyze the continuities and transformations of the concept of <em>anima mundi</em> in the three philosophers mentioned.</p> 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/100385 Ethics and politics of virtue: from Classical Antiquity to Modern Society 2025-12-11T08:34:00+00:00 Andrés de Francisco Díaz afrancis@ucm.es <p>This article examines the evolution of the concept of virtue from classical antiquity to modernity, with special attention to its reception in Rome and its transformation in the Christian and modern eras. A distinction is made between the theory of virtue and the compendiums of virtues, analyzing the Platonic and Aristotelian models, and projecting onto the modern world the main problems—factionalism, greed, and lack of freedom—that Cicero, Sallust, and Tacitus considered as causes of the moral decline of their time. The text explores how modernity marked a rupture with the tradition of virtue ethics, which underwent various inflections, and how it believed it could overcome these same problems by relying on the rule of law backed by the state, the primacy of legal order, and the invisible action of interest-aggregation mechanisms. Finally, it is argued that the persistence of these issues confirms the ongoing need for virtue ethics as a key to addressing contemporary challenges.</p> 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/97708 Thucydidean Influence on Hobbesian Anthropology 2025-12-11T08:34:08+00:00 Andrés Di Leo Razuk dileorazuk@gmail.com <p>The present work analyses the Thucydides’ influence in Hobbes’ anthropology, in spite of the fact that he never referred to Thucydides in his political theory works. For this to be, in first place, reference is made to the context of production and to the preliminary writings of the edition of Hobbes’ translation of the <em>Peloponnesian War</em>. Secondly, four notions are identified in the Greek thinker’s text: immanent cause, human nature, passions and hiding. Thirdly, we demonstrate how the British thinker appropriates such notions utilizing the geometric method and modern mechanistic metaphysics. Finally, we conclude that this reception provides the possibility of elevating to universal and self-evident categories the Thucydides’ notions, and in such case part of Hobbes’ political philosophy would attempt to be a synthesis between classic humanism and modern natural science. This allows, on the one hand, to rethink the link between the classical and modern world, and, on the other hand, the possibility of extracting trans-historical concepts that can explain different political conjunctures.</p> 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/95230 The axiological method of Juan de Borja’s Empresas morales (1680) 2025-12-11T08:34:09+00:00 David Mª González Cea tomaeludovici@gmail.com <p>In this work, we investigate the method used by Juan de Borja to convince the readers of his doctrine. The author puts his rhetorical resources at the service of his Thomistic teleological moral evaluation system, to convince the reader of its importance. In <em>Empresas Morales</em> (1680), Borja proposes the reader to consider the value of earthly things in relation to the ultimate aim. We can see an important influence of Saint Thomas Aquinas’s theory of the sign in his work. According to that theory, emblems have a transcendent objective: to persuade the reader</p> 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INGE/article/view/98818 Historiographical Perspectives on Marius Salamonius’ Contribution to the Principle of Popular Sovereignty 2025-12-11T08:34:03+00:00 Maria Antonietta Salamone Savona masalamo@ucm.es <p>The purpose of this article is to examine the recent historiography of modern political thought (Skinner, Millar, Straumann and Lee), which now fully agrees with D'Addio and Gierke that it was Roman law that played a fundamental role in the development of the idea of popular sovereignty and the doctrine of the social contract; and this thanks to the contribution of the legal humanist Salamone who, in 1513, definitively demonstrated the falsity of the medieval theory of the <em>translatio imperii</em> unintentionally promoted by Ulpian (according to which the Roman people irrevocably transferred sovereign power to the prince Octavian Augustus through the <em>Lex Regia</em>) and the validity of the words of Pomponius, according to which the Roman people elected princes not as masters or <em>legibus solutus</em>, but as ministers, since tyranny and principality are irreconcilable systems by nature. Today, this current of modern historiography takes for granted the idea that the theory of <em>concessio imperii</em>, developed by Salamone himself in <em>De Principatu</em>, forged the general principle of popular sovereignty - <em>the political power of the People is superior to that of the Prince </em>- which was later taken up by Calvinists and French humanists (as well as by the Spanish philosophers and jurists of the School of Salamanca). Besides, this theory would have been the true foundation of the modern doctrine of popular sovereignty and the social contract as conceived by Rousseau, who in his <em>Du contrat social</em> considers the Roman Republic as an example to be followed.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"> </p> 2025-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología de las Ideas