Parliamentarians on Twitter: A literature review
- Luis Jorge Orcasitas Pacheco University of Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-4333
- Elen Cristina Geraldes University of Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0073-2001
- Georgete Medleg Rodrigues University of Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6446-6171
Abstract
This article presents a literature review in the field of parliamentary agents' interventions on Twitter, from the multidisciplinary perspective established by Information Science with Social Sciences and Computer Science. It includes 92 studies on political information and communication, which examine the participation of different types of legislators on Twitter, in heterogeneous communication scenarios and outside of electoral periods. In this way, the evolution of referential works in the sociotechnical network developed between 2009 and 2022 is examined, and two fundamental analytical areas are considered: senders and receivers (legislators and citizens) and their interactions, and political debate. The importance of research, the methodological approaches that have been applied, and the techniques and methods for analyzing the performances of parliamentarians on Twitter are shown. Next, some considerations are presented on the development and perspectives of academic research focused on the sociotechnical network, in the field of the Legislative Branch.
References
Adams, A. y McCorkindale, T. (2013). Dialogue and transparency: A content
analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used Twitter. Public Relations Review, (39), 357-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.016
Adi, A., Erickson, K. y Lilleker, D. (2014). Elite Tweets: Analyzing the Twitter
communication patterns of Labour party peers in the House of Lords. Policy and Internet, (6), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI350
Akirav, O. (2017). The talk–listen–respond (TLR) model of representatives on
Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23(3), 392-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1359942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1359942
Almeida Marques, F., Alves de Aquino, J. y Miola, E. (2014a). Deputados
brasileiros no Twitter: um estudo quantitativo dos padrões de adoção e uso da ferramenta. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, (14), 201-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-335220141408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-335220141408
Almeida Marques, F., Alves de Aquino, J. y Miola, E. (2014b). Parlamentares,
representação política e redes sociais digitais: perfis de uso do Twitter na Câmara dos Deputados. Opinião Pública, 20(2), 178-203. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912014202178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912014202178
Álvarez Sabalegui, D. y Rodríguez Andrés, R. (2014). Parlamentarios 2.0: presencia y actividad de diputados y senadores españoles en las redes sociales. En R. Rubio Núñez, (Coord.). Parlamentos Abiertos. Tecnología y redes para la democracia (pp. 235-275). Cuadernos del Congreso de los Diputados. https://n9.cl/hg7wi.
Agarwal, P., Sastry, N. y Wood, E. (2019, 11 de junio). Tweeting MPs: Digital
engagement between citizens and members of Parliament in the UK [Conferencia] International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Múnich, Alemania. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3359
Akhtar, S. y Morrison, C. (2019). The prevalence and impact of online trolling of
UK members of parliament. Computers in Human Behavior, (99), 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.015
Andradas, C. (2019). Prólogo del rector. En I. Fernández Bayo, O. Menéndez, J.
Fuertes, M. Milán y R. Mecha (Org.), La Comunidad Científica ante las Redes Sociales. Guía de Actuación para Divulgar Ciencia a través de ellas (p. 5). Editora Universidad Complutense. https://n9.cl/ob5jw.
Aramayo Gaona, M.(2021). Uso y discurso político de Twitter: El caso del
congresista peruano Daniel Urresti [Disertación de maestría, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja]. Repositorio institucional Universidad Internacional de La Rioja.
Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. y Tucker, J. (2019). Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883-901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352
Bohórquez Pereira, G., Flórez Quintero, Juan. y Alguero Montaño, M. (2020).
Comunicación digital entre ediles y usuarios en Twitter. Oportunidad fallida en el fortalecimiento de imagen y vigencia en la esfera pública. Ánfora, 27(49), 173-196. https://n9.cl/lzm54.
Boireau, M. (2014, 18 de noviembre). Determining Political Stances from Twitter
Timelines: The Belgian Parliament Case. [Conferencia] EGOSE ‘14, San Petersburgo, Federación Rusa. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2729104.2729114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2729104.2729114
Borge Bravo, R. y Esteve del Valle, M. (2017). Leaders or Brokers? Potential
in Online Parliamentary Networks. Policy and Internet, 10(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.150
Brum Bernardes, C. (2020). Uso do Twitter para engajamento político: análise dos
perfis das assembleias legislativas da Região Sudeste. Revista Compolítica, 10(3), 5-47. https://n9.cl/es3lx.
Buckland, M. (1991). Information as thing. JASIST, 42(5), 351-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<351::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-3
Buckland, M. (1997). What is a “document”? Journal of the American Society of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199709)48:9<804::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-V
Information Science, 48(9), 804-809. https://n9.cl/n2wfj1.
Campos-Domínguez, E. (2017). Twitter y la comunicación política. El profesional DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01
de la información, 26(5), 785-793. https://n9.cl/3oo55.
Campos-Domínguez, E., Esteve Del Valle, M. y Renedo-Farpón, C. (2022).
Rhetoric of parliamentary disinformation on Twitter. Comunicar, 30(72), 4, 7-57. https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-04
Cárdenas Ruíz, J., Roncallo-Dow, S. y Cruz-González, M. (2020). Los líderes
sociales en la agenda digital de los congresistas colombianos: entre la corrección política y la denuncia directa. Análisis político, (98), 66-84, https://n9.cl/bcn5m.
Castanho Silva, B. y Proksch, S.O. (2022). Politicians unleashed? Political
communication on Twitter and in parliament in Western Europe. Political Science Research and Methods, (10), 776-792. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.36
Cherepnalkoski, D. y Mozetič, I. (2015). A retweet network analysis of the
European Parliament. [Conferencia] International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems, Bangkok, Tailandia. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2015.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2015.8
Cherepnalkoski, D., Karpf, A., Mozetič, I. y Grčar, M. (2016). Cohesion and
Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities. PLoS ONE, 11(11), e0166586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166586
Chi, F. y Yang, N. (2011). Twitter Adoption in Congress. Review of Network
Economics, 10(1), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1255
Chin, A., Coimbra Vieira, C. y Kim, J. (2022, 26 de junio). Evaluating Digital
Polarization in Multi-Party Systems: Evidence from the German Bundestag. [Conferencia] WebSci’22, Barcelona, España. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501247.3531547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3501247.3531547
Cook, J. (2016). Twitter Adoption in U.S. Legislatures: A Fifty-State Study.
[Conferencia] SMSociety ‘16, Londres, Reino Unido. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930982
Daniel, W., Obholzer, L. y Hurka, S. (2019). Static and dynamic incentives for
Twitter usage in the European Parliament. Party Politics, 25(6) 771-781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817747755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817747755
Do Nascimento de Almeida, H. (2013, 23 de octubre). Análise dos usos das NTICs
pelos parlamentares brasileiros: Um estudo sobre o Facebook e Twitter pelos deputados federais brasileiros em 2013. [Conferencia] Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais-ANPOCS, Águas de Lindóia, Brasil. https://n9.cl/rvdq5.
Do Nascimento de Almeida, H. y Peixoto Vale Gomes, L. (2021). Embates e
silêncios: Lideranças Partidárias do Legislativo no Twitter. Aurora: Revista de arte, mídia e política, 14(40), 68-90. https://n9.cl/kyvlzv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/1982-6672.2021v14i40p68-90
Escarpit, R. (1976). L’information et la communication: théorie générale.
Hachette Superiour. https://n9.cl/hcyws.
Esteve del Valle, M. y Borge Bravo, R. (2017). Opinion leadership in parliamentary
Twitter networks: A matter of layers of interaction? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 263-276.: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1337602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1337602
Esteve Del Valle, M. y Borge Bravo, R. (2018). Echo Chambers in Parliamentary
Twitter Networks: The Catalan Case. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1715–1735. https://n9.cl/uxqz5.
Esteve Del Valle, M., Broersma, M. y Ponsioen, A. (2021). Political Interaction
Beyond Party Lines: Communication Ties and Party Polarization in Parliamentary Twitter Networks. Social Science Computer Review, 40(3), 736-755. https://n9.cl/ku6qh. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320987569
Ebrey, R., Hall, S. y Willis, R. (2020). Is Twitter Indicating a Change in MP’s
Views on Climate Change? Sustainability, (12), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410334
Frohmann, B. (2006). O caráter social, material e público da informação. En M.
Spotti Lopes Fujita, R. M. Marteleto y M. Lopes Ginez de Lara (Org.). A dimensão epistemológica da Informação e suas interfaces técnicas, políticas e institucionais nos processos de produção, acesso e disseminação da informação (pp. 19-34). Fundepe. https://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/v/176667.
Freire, N. (2019). Por qué es Twitter el territorio político digital. POLIS México,
(2), 39-74. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2019v15n2/freire. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2019v15n2/Freire
Fuente-Alba Cariola, F. y Parada Gavilán, C. (2019). Eficacia de los sitios webs
como herramienta comunicacional de los diputados chilenos. Revista de Comunicación, 18(2), 139-154. https://n9.cl/2o7n5.
García-Sánchez, E., Rolo Benetti, P., Higa, G. y Álvarez, M. (2021). Political
discourses, ideologies, and online coalitions in the Brazilian Congress on Twitter during 2019. New Media & Society, 00(0), 1-23. https://n9.cl/wf91eu.
Gelpi Texeira, R. (2018). Política 2.0: las redes sociales (Facebok y Twitter) como
instrumento de comunicación política. Estudio: caso Uruguay. [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Complutense]. Repositorio institucional Universidad Complutense. https://n9.cl/8am6kc.
Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. y Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612-1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21344
Golbeck, J., Auxier, B., Bickford, A., Cabrera, L., Conte McHugh, M., Moore, S.,
Hart, J., Resti, J., Rogers, A. y Zimmerman, J. (2018). Congressional Twitter Use Revisited on the Platform’s 10-Year Anniversary. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(8), 1067-1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24022
González de Gómez, M. (2000). Metodologia de pesquisa no campo da Ciência da
Informação. DataGramaZero-Revista de Ciência da Informação, 1(6), 1-11. https://n9.cl/apmwh.
Grant, W., Moon, B. y Busby Grant, J. (2010). Digital Dialogue? Australian
Politicians’ use of the Social Network Tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 579-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.517176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.517176
Guirao Goris, S. J. A. (2015). Utilidad y tipos de revisión de literatura. Ene, 9(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1988-348X2015000200002
-25. https://n9.cl/cftwy.
Gulati, G., Williams, C. (2010). Communicating with Constituents in 140
Characters or Less: Twitter and the Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the United States Congress. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628247
Haman, M. y Školník, M. (2021). Politicians on Social Media. The online database
of members of national parliaments on Twitter. El Profesional de la información, 30(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.17
Hegelich, S. y Shahrezaye, M. (2015). The Communication Behavior of German
MPs on Twitter: Preaching to the Converted and Attacking Opponents. European Policy Analysis, 1(2), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.18278/epa.1.2.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18278/epa.1.2.8
Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J. y Shapiro, M. (2013, 23 de febrero). What’s Congress
Doing on Twitter? [Conferencia] CSCW’13, San Antonio, Estados Unidos. https://n9.cl/ggu4t.
Hermanns, H. (2017). The Digital Political Communication of South Korean
Politicians. JeDEM, (9)2, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v9i2.460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v9i2.460
Herrera Damas, L. (2015). Análisis de la comunicación de los partidos políticos
españoles en Twitter: evaluación y buenas prácticas. [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Carlos III]. Repositorio institucional Universidad Carlos III. https://n9.cl/mfp84i.
Hsu, C. y Park, H. W. (2011). Sociology of Hyperlink Networks of Web 1.0, Web
0, and Twitter: A Case Study of South Korea. Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), 354-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310382517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310382517
Hsu, C. y Park, H. W. (2012). Mapping online social networks of Korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.009
Jackson, N. y Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, Constituency Service and
Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86–105. https://n9.cl/nzort.
Jungherr, A. (2014a). Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Disponible en SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402443
Jungherr, A. (2014b). The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal
dynamics and content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239-259 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087
Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature
review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
Keller, T. y Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2018). Followers, Spread the Message!
Predicting the Success of Swiss Politicians on Facebook and Twitter. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 2056305118765733. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051187657.
Klinger, U. y Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of networkmedia logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, (17), 1241-1257. https://n9.cl/ha2mu. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
Koiranen, I., Koivula, A., Keipi, T. y Saarinen, A. (2019). Shared contexts, shared
background, shared values-Homophily in Finnish parliament members’ social networks on Twitter. Telematics and Informatics, (36), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.009
Lassen D., Brown, A. y Riding, S. (2010, 25 de abril). Twitter: The Electoral
Connection? [Conferencia] Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Estados Unidos. https://n9.cl/orlu4.
Lassen, D. y Brown, A. (2011). Twitter: The Electoral Connection? Social Science
Computer Review, (29),4, 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310382749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310382749
Leston-Bandeira, C. (2014). The pursuit of legitimacy as a key driver for public
engagement: The European Parliament case. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2), 437-457. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss050
Leston-Bandeira, C. y Bender, D. (2013). How deeply are parliaments engaging on
social media? Information Polity, 18(4), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130316
Machi, L. y McEvoy, B. (2009). The Literature Review. Six Steps to Success. Corwin.
Mankad, S. y Michailidis, G. (2015). Analysis of multiview legislative networks
with structured matrix factorization: Does twitter influence translate to the real world? The Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(4), 1950-1972. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-AOAS858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/15-AOAS858
Margaretten, M. y Gaber, I. (2014). The Crisis in Public Communication and the
Pursuit of Authenticity: An Analysis of the Twitter Feeds of Scottish MPs 2008–2010. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2), 328-350. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss043
Marín Dueñas, P., Simancas González, E. y Berzosa Moreno, A. (2016). Uso e
influencia de Twitter en la comunicación política: el caso del Partido Popular y
Podemos en las elecciones generales de 2016. Cuadernos. Info, (45), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.45.1595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.45.1595
Marres, N. (2012). The redistribution of methods: on intervention in digital social DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02121.x
research. The sociological review, 60(1), 139-165. https://n9.cl/bbk9m.
Meler, A. (2022). Parlamentarne ćwierKanie o pandemii. analiza Sentymentu
tweetów parlamentarzyStów publiKowanych podczaS pierwSzych 12 mieSięcy pandemii KoronawiruSa w polSce. Studia Socjologiczne, 245(2), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2022.141425.
Merkovity, N. (2018). Towards self-mediatization of politics Parliamentarians’ use DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657431-4
of Facebook and Twitter in Croatia and Hungary. En P. Surowiec, V. Štětka (Ed.), Social Media and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 64-80). Routledge.
Meyriat, J. (2016). Documento, documentação, documentologia. Perspectivas em
Ciência da Informação, 21(3), 240-253. https://n9.cl/8n1li.
Miragliotta, N. (2012). Politicians, Twitter and the Limits of the Virtual Political
Public Sphere. Social Alternatives, 31(2), 6-10. https://n9.cl/kqh7x.
Missingham, R. (2010). The Australian Parliament in the Twitterverse.
Australasian Parliamentary Review, 25(1), 3-16. https://n9.cl/25x60.
Moreiro González, J. (2010). Palavra, Termo, Conceito: das linguagens
documentárias até os vocabulários semânticos para a Web. En L. Silva de Freitas, C. H. Marcondes y A. C. Rodrigues (Org. ), Documento: gênese e contextos do uso (pp. 11-34). Editora da Universidade Federal Fluminense.
Moya Sánchez, M. (2014). Análisis comunicacional del uso que los diputados
españoles hacen de Twitter: Evaluación e implicaciones prácticas. [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Carlos III]. Repositorio institucional Universidad Carlos III. https://n9.cl/wj3gz.
Oelsner, K. y Heimrich, L. (2015). Social media use of German politicians: Towards dialogic voter relations? German Politics, 24(4), 451-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2015.1021790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2015.1021790
Oliveira, L., Vaz de Melo, P. O. S., Amaral, M. S. y Pinho J. A. (2018, 25 de junio). When Politicians Talk About Politics: Identifying Political Tweets of Brazilian Congressmen. [Conferencia] International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Palo Alto, Estados Unidos. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.08559.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15051
Olof Larsson, A. (2015). The EU Parliament on Twitter-Assessing the Permanent
Online Practices of Parliamentarians. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.994158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.994158
Page, M., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C., Shamseer,
L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.…y Alonso-Fernández, S. (2020). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010
Pal, J., Gonawela, A. (2017). Studying political communication on Twitter: the
case for small data. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, (18), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.009
Panasyuk, A., Szu Li Yu, E. y Mehrotra, K. (2014). Controversial topic discovery on members of Congress with Twitter. Procedia Computer Science, 36, 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.073
Pano Alamán, A. y Mancera Rueda, A. (2014). La “conversación” en Twitter: las
unidades discursivas y el uso de marcadores interactivos en los intercambios con parlamentarios españoles en esta red social. Estudios de Lingüística del Español, (35), 234-2681. http://infoling.org/elies.
Peeters, J., Van Aelst, P. y Praet, S. (2021). Party ownership or individual
specialization? A comparison of politicians’ individual issue attention across three different agendas. Party Politics, 27(4), 692-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819881639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819881639
Percastre-Mendizábal, S., Pont-Sorribes, C. y Codina, L. (2017). A sample design
proposal for the analysis of Twitter in political communication. El profesional de la información, 26(4), 579-588. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.02
Peterson, R. D. (2012). To tweet or not to tweet: Exploring the determinants of
early adoption of Twitter by House members in the 111th Congress. The Social Science Journal, 49(4), 430-438. https://n9.cl/j4abi.
Polk, M. (2014). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a
transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, (65), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
Rauchfleisch, A. y Metag, J. (2015). The special case of Switzerland: Swiss
politicians on Twitter. New Media & Society. 00(0), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815586982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815586982
Reveilhac, M. y Morselli, D. (2021). The impact of social media use for elected
parliamentarians: Evidence from politicians’ use of Twitter during the last two Swiss legislatures. Swiss Political Sci. Rev, (00), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12543
Rodríguez-Andrés, R. y Álvarez-Sabalegui, D. (2018). Presencia y actividad de
los parlamentos autonómicos en las redes sociales: pocos avances en el fomento de la participación ciudadana. El profesional de la información, 27(5), 994-1003. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.04
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisión sistemática X revisión narrativa. Acta paulista de DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001
enfermagem, 20(2), ix-x. https://n9.cl/2yjg6.
Rusche, F. (2022). Few voices, strong echo: Measuring follower homogeneity of
politicians’ Twitter accounts. New Media & Society, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099860
Russell, A. (2018). U.S. Senators on Twitter: Asymmetric Party Rhetoric in 140
Characters. American Politics Research, 46(4) 695-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17715619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17715619
Russell, A. (2021). Minority Opposition and Asymmetric Parties? Senators’
Partisan Rhetoric on Twitter. Political Research Quarterly, 74(3), 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920921239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920921239
Sæbø, Ø. (2011, 25 de agosto). Understanding Twitter Use among Parliament
Representatives: A Genre Analysis. [Conferencia] WG 8.5 International Conference, Delft, Países Bajos. https://n9.cl/f8u93r.
Sältzer, M. (2022). Finding the bird’s wings: Dimensions of factional conflict on
Twitter. Party Politics, 28(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820957960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820957960
Santos Amaral, M. y Gomes de Pinho, J. (2017). Ideologias partidárias em 140
caracteres: Uso do Twitter pelos parlamentares Brasileiros. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 51(6), 1041-1057. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612155837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612155837
Saracevic, T. (1996). Ciência da informação: origem, evolução e relações. Perspec.
Ci. Inf., 1(1), 41-62. https://n9.cl/prawv.
Severo, M. y Lamarche-Perrin, R. (2018). L’analyse des opinions politiques sur DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.593.0507
Twitter: Défis et opportunités d’une approche multi-échelle. Revue française de sociologie, 59(3), 507-532. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02188391.
Shapiro, M., Hemphill. L., Otterbacher, J. y Park, H. W. (2014). Twitter and
Political Communication in Korea: Are Members of the Assembly Doing
WhatThey Say? Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 3(3), 338-35.
Scherpereel, J., Wohlgemuth, J. y Schmelzinger, M. (2016). The Adoption and Use
of Twitter as a Representational Tool among Members of the European Parliament. European Politics and Society, 18(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1151125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1151125
Scherpereel, J., Wohlgemuth, J. y Lievens, A. (2018). Does Institutional Setting
Affect Legislators’ Use of Twitter? Policy and Internet, 10(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.156
Silva, C. (2014). Online party communication: websites in the non-electoral
contexto. En P. Serra, E. Camilo, G. Gonçalves (Eds.), Political participation and Web 2.0, (pp. 197-242). Livros LabCom.
Small, T. (2010). Canadian Politics in 140 Characters: Party Politics in the Twitterverse. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 33(3), 39-45. https://n9.cl/tr5mk.
Straus, J., Glassman, M., Shogan, C. y Navarro Smelcer, S. (2013). Communicating in 140 Characters or Less: Congressional Adoption of Twitter in the 111th. Congress. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512001242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512001242
Thamm, M. y Bleier, A. (2013, 2 de mayo). When Politicians Tweet: A Study on the Members of the German Federal Diet. [Conferencia] WebSci’13, París, Francia. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.1734.pdf.
Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z. y Popa, S. (2020). The Dynamics of
Political Incivility on Twitter. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447
Tramullas, J. (2020). Temas y métodos de investigación en Ciencia de la
Información, 2000-2019. Revisión bibliográfica. El profesional de la información, 29(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.17
Tromble, R. (2016) The great leveler? Comparing citizen-politician Twitter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-016-0022-6
engagement across three Western democracies. European Political Science, 17, 223-239. https://n9.cl/cvtta.
Umit, R. (2017). Strategic communication of EU affairs: an analysis of legislative behaviour on Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23(1), 93-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1283166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1283166
Unkel, J. y Kümpel, A. S. (2022). Patterns of Incivility on U.S. Congress Members’ Social Media Accounts: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Influence of Platform, Post, and Person Characteristics. Frontiers in Political Science, 4(8), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.809805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.809805
Van Vliet, L., Törnberg, P. y Uitermark, J. (2020). The Twitter parliamentarian
database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries. PLoSONE, 15(9), p. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237073
Van Vliet, L., Törnberg, P. y Uitermark, J. (2021). Political Systems and Political
Networks: The Structure of Parliamentarians’ Retweet Networks in 19 Countries. International Journal of Communication, 15, 2156-2176. https://n9.cl/vzsoe.
Vasko, V. y Trilling, D. (2019). A permanent campaign? Tweeting differences
among members of Congress between campaign and routine periods. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(4), 342-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1657046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1657046
Von Nordheim G., Rieger, J. y Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2021): From the Fringes to the Core – An Analysis of Right-Wing Populists’ Linking Practices in Seven EU Parliaments and Switzerland. Digital Journalism, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1970602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1970602
Ward, S. y Mcloughlin, L. (2020). Turds, traitors and tossers: the abuse of UK MPs DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1730502
via Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 26(1), 47-73. https://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/47069/.
Williamson, A. (2009). The Effect of Digital Media on MPs’ Communication with
Constituents. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(3), 514-527. doi:10.1093/pa/gsp009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp009
Welp. Y. y Marzuca, A. (2016). Presencia de partidos políticos y diputados en
Internet en Argentina, Paraguay y Uruguay. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 24(47), 199-224. https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2447-011-2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2447-011-2016
Wynes, S., Kotcher, J. y Donner, S. (2021). Climatic Change 168(6), 1-60.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03215-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03215-9
Żakowska, M. y Domalewska, D. (2019). Factors Determining Polish
Parliamentarians’ Tweets on Migration: A Case Study of Poland. Politologický Časopis, 26(3), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/110722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/110722
Format
Crossmark
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
