Echoic interrogatives in Aristophanes from a syntactic perspective
- Diego Gibanel University of Alcalá https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9560-0337
Abstract
Echo questions or echoics are utterances that represent a prior linguistic or contextual stimulus in the discourse (broadly understood). Their study as a category has been dealt with in different languages, but not generally in Ancient Greek. In this language, echoics present as a fundamental characteristic the alternation between the interrogative paradigms of τίς and ὅστις. In this paper we characterise the echo questions in the corpus of Aristophanes' comedies, classifying them based on their syntactic structure and relating their interpretation to the general postulates of echoic interrogatives in other languages. Several previously undescribed sequences are thus catalogued here. Finally, it is argued that the occurrence of ὅστις in Greek echoics corresponds to a syntactic mark related to the interpretative meaning of these sequences, which finds correlates in other languages such as Spanish.
References
AELBRECHT, Lobke (2010), The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis, Ámsterdam, John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.149
ALLOTT, Nicholas (2017), «Metarepresentation», en A. Barron, Y. Gu & G. Steen (eds.), The Rouletdge Handbook of Pragmatics, Londres, Routledge: 295-309. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668925-23
ARISTÓFANES (1995), Comedias. I: Los Acarnienses — Los Caballeros. [Introducción, traducción y notas de Luis Gil Fernández], Barcelona, Gredos.
ARISTÓFANES (2007a), Comedias. II: Las Nubes — Las Avispas — La Paz — Los Pájaros. [Introducciones, traducción y notas de Luis M. Macía Aparicio], Barcelona, Gredos.
ARISTÓFANES (2007b), Comedias. III: Lisístrata — Las Tesmoforias — Las Ranas — La Asamblea de las Mujeres — Pluto. [Introducciones, traducción y notas de Luis M. Macía Aparicio], Barcelona, Gredos.
BANFIELD, Ann (1982), Unspeakable Sentences, Abingdon-on-Thames, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
BARON-COHEN, Simon (1995), Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind, Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001
BECK, Sigrid & REIS, Marga (2018), «On the form and interpretation of echo wh-questions», Journal of Semantics 35: 369-408. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffy002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffy002
BIRAUD, Michèle & MELLET, Sylvie (2000), «Les faits d’hétérogénéité énonciative dans les textes grecs et latins de l’Antiquité», en S. Mellet & M. Villaume (eds.), Le style indirect libre et ses contextes, Leiden, Brill: 49-118. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454866_004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454866_004
BOLINGER, Dwight LeMerton (1957), Interrogative Structures of American English, Tuscaloosa (Alabama), Alabama University Press.
BOLINGER, Dwight LeMerton (1978), «Asking more than One Thing at a Time», HTZ: 87-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_4
BUNT, Harry (1994), «Context and dialogue control», Think Quarterly 3: 19-31.
BUNT, Harry, VAN KATWIJK, A.F.V., MULLER, L.F. & VAN NES, F. L. (1980), «Dialogue control acts», IPO Annual Progress Report 15: 95-134.
CARSTON, Robyn (2002), Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication, Orlando (Florida), Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603
CASADO VELARDE, Manuel (2013), «¿Multiculturaliqué? La interrogación ecoica con ¿ qué? en español y sus funciones discursivas», Oralia: Análisis del discurso oral 16: 59-80. https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v16i1.8030. Extraído de https://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/ORALIA/article/view/8030/6709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v16i1.8030
CHANTRAINE, Pierre (1961), Morphologie historique du grec, París, Klincksieck.
CHERNOVA, E. (2014), Multiple Q-movement in true and echo wh-questions: A Q-based approach, [Tesis doctoral], Universitat de Girona.
CLACKSON, J. (2007), Indo-European Linguistics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808616
COLLARD, Christopher (2005), «Colloquial language in tragedy: A supplement to the work of P. T. Stevens», Classical Quarterly 55(2): 350-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/bmi037
CRANE, Thera Marie (2023), «Looking for evidentiality (and mirativity) in Bantu», Studies in African Linguistics 52(14): 9-27. Extraído de https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstreams/a260aa05-878d-473e-b738-ebf536f41703/download DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.52.Supplement.14.130956
CRESPO, Emilio, MAQUIEIRA, Helena & CONTI, Luz (2003), Sintaxis del griego clásico, Barcelona, Gredos.
DEMONTE, Violeta & FERNÁNDEZ SORIANO, Olga (2007), «La periferia izquierda oracional y los complementantes del español», en J. Cuartero Otal & M. Emsel (eds.), Vernetzungen: Bedeutung in Wort, Satz und Text: Festschrift für Gerd Wotjak, n.º 65, Lausanne, Peter Lang: 133-145. Extraído de http://www.lineas.cchs.csic.es/lycc/sites/lineas.cchs.csic.es.lycc/files/perif.pdf
DEMONTE, Violeta & FERNÁNDEZ SORIANO, Olga (2013), «El que citativo, otros que de la periferia izquierda oracional y la recomplementación», en D. Jacob & K. Ploog (eds.), Autour de que – El entorno de que, Lausanne, Peter Lang: 47-70. Extraído de http://www.lineas.cchs.csic.es/lycc/sites/lineas.cchs.csic.es.lycc/files/demonte-soriano-autour-de-que-2013.pdf
DI TULLIO, Ángela (2010), «Preguntas hendidas y preguntas segmentadas», Cuadernos de la ALFAL 1: 70-82. Extraído de https://mundoalfal.org/sites/default/files/revista/01_cuaderno_005.pdf
DRIESEN, Marijke (2019), A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the discourse marker ati/eti in Swahili: A corpus-driven approach, [Tesis doctoral], Ghent University. Extraído de https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/782/237/RUG01-002782237_2019_0001_AC.pdf
DUMITRESCU, Domnita (1991), «General considerations about Echo Questions in Spanish and Romanian: Towards defining the concept (II)», Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 5-6: 279-315.
DUMITRESCU, Domnita (1993), «La función pragma-discursiva de la interrogación ecoica usada como respuesta en español», Diálogos hispánicos 12: 51-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004655560_004
DUMITRESCU, Domnita (1998), «Subordinación y recursividad en la conversación: las secuencias integradas por intercambios ecoicos», Diálogos hispánicos 22: 277-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004655645_011
DUMITRESCU, Domnita (2016), «Oraciones interrogativas directas», en J. Gutiérrez Rexach (coord.), Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, Abingdon-on-Thames, Routledge: 750-760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713441-66
DUNBAR, N. (1964), Aristophanes’ Birds [Introducción y comentario], Oxford, Oxford Univeristy Press.
ESCANDELL-VIDAL, M.ª Victoria (1999), «Los enunciados interrogativos. Aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos», en V. Demonte & I. Bosque (coords.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 3, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe: 3929-3992.
ESCANDELL-VIDAL, M.ª Victoria (2002), «Echo-syntax and metarepresentations», Lingua: International review of general linguistics 112(11): 871-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00051-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00051-7
ESCANDELL-VIDAL, M.ª Victoria (2014), La comunicación: Lengua, cognición y sociedad, Madrid, Akal.
FAURE, Richard (2021), The Syntax and Semantics of Wh-Clauses in Classical Greek: Relatives, Interrogatives, Exclamatives, Leiden, Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004467538
GALLEGO BARTOLOMÉ, Ángel J. (2015), «Elipsis», en J. Gutiérrez Rexach (coord.), Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, Vol. 1, Abingdon-on-Thames, Routledge: 544-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713441-49
GIANNAKIS, Georgios K. (2013), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics Online, Leiden, Brill.
GREEN, Mitchell (2020), «Speech Acts», en E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Edición de 2020). Extraído de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/speech-acts/.
GRICE, H. Paul (1969), «Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions», Philosophical Review 78(2): 147-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2184179
GRICE, H. Paul (1989), Studies in the way of words, Cambridge (Massachusetts), Harvard University Press.
GRIFFITHS, J. (2019), «A Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the preposition stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without movement», Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.653. Extraído de https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5119/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.653
HAPPÉ, Francesca & LOTH, Eva (2002), «‘Theory of mind’ and tracking speakers’ intentions», Mind & Language 17(1-2): 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00187
HERITAGE, John (1989), «Current developments in conversation analysis», en D. Roger & P. Bull (eds.), In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Nueva York, Avon: 21-47.
HORNBLOWER, Simon, SPAWFORTH, Anthony, & EIDINOW, Esther (eds.) (2012), The Oxford Classical Dictionary (4th ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199545568.001.0001
HUDDLESTON, Rodney D. (1988), English Grammar – An Outline, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166003
IKARASHI, Keita (2015), «The Japanese Sentence-Final Particle No and Mirativity», Tsukuba English Studies 34: 79-98. Extraído de https://tsukuba.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/44481/files/TES_34-79.pdf
JIMÉNEZ LÓPEZ, M.ª Dolores (coord.) (2020), Sintaxis del griego antiguo. Vol I & Vol. II, Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC).
KIHARA, C. Patrick (2017), «A functional analysis of atî and its variants atîtîrî and atîrî as complementisers and discourse markers in Gîkûyû», The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics 6: 103-127. Extraído de https://uonjournals.uonbi.ac.ke/ojs/index.php/unjll/article/view/1646
KÜHNER, Raphael & GERTH, Bernhard (1898-1904), Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. II: Satzlehre, 2 vols, Hahn [reimpr. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2015].
LASNIK, Howard (2005), «On ellipsis: Is material that is phonetically absent but semantically present or absent syntactically?», en H. Götzche (ed.), Memory, mind and language, Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 221-242. Extraído de https://terpconnect.umd.edu/~lasnik/Lasnik%20manuscripts/Lasnik%20Denmark%20ms%20A4.pdf
LASNIK, Howard (2014), «Multiple sluicing in English?», Syntax 17(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12009
LEWIS, D. (1979), «Scorekeeping in a Language Game», Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00258436. Extraído de https://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/f09/semprag1/lewis79.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258436
MCCAWLEY, James D. (1988), The Syntactic Phenomena of English, Vol. 2., Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
MÉNDEZ DOSUNA, Julián Víctor (2022), «Los pronombres y demostrativos», en M.ª D. Jiménez López (coord.), Sintaxis del griego antiguo, Vol. 1, Madrid, CSIC: 407-440.
MERCHANT, J. (2001), The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and theory of ellipsis, Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001
MERCHANT, J. (2004), «Fragments and ellipsis», Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3. Extraído de https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3#citeas DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3
MERCHANT, J. (2013), «Voice and ellipsis», Linguistic Inquiry 4(1): 77-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/23358089 Extraído de http://home.uchicago.edu/merchant/pubs/voice.ellipsis.LI.2013.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00120
MONTEIL, Pierre (1963), La phrase relative en grec ancien. Sa formation, son développement, sa structure des origines à la fin du Ve. siècle a.C., París, Klincksieck.
NAVARRO ROMERO, Eduardo Felipe (2018), «El pronombre relativo en indoeuropeo. Antiguos planteamientos y nuevas perspectivas», Nexo: Revista intercultural de arte y humanidades 15: 1-5. Extraído de https://www.iehcan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2.-EL-PRONOMBRE-RELATIVO-EN-INDOEUROPEO.pdf
NOH, Eun-Ju (1998), «Echo Questions: Metarepresentation and Pragmatic Enrichment», Linguistics and Philosophy 21(6): 603-628. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005361528891. Extraído de https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005361528891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005361528891
PEDROTE DE SAN JUAN, Irene & CAMARGO FERNÁNDEZ, Laura (2025), «Las interrogativas de eco en el discurso oral: funciones pragmáticas y discursivas», Pragmalingüística 33: 133-149. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2025.i.33.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2025.i.33.09
PERSOHN, Bastian (2020), The verb in Nyakyusa: A focus on tense, aspect and modality. Second revised edition, Berlín, Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4287412. Extraído de https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/297
PESETSKY, Da (1987), «Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding», en E.J. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, Cabridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press: 98-129.
PLATNAUER, M. (1964), Aristophanes’ Peace [Introducción y comentario], Oxford, Oxford University Press.
POMERANTZ, Aanita (1984), «Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes», en J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, Cambridge (Massachusetts), Cambridge University Press: 57-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008
QUIRK, Randolph, GREENBAUM, Sidney, LEECH, Geoffrey & SVARTVIK, Jan (1988), A comprehensive grammar of the english language, Harlow, Longman.
RAE-ASALE (2009), Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española, Barcelona, Espasa.
REVUELTA PUIGDOLLERS, Antonio (2022a), «El verbo (III). Modo y modalidad», en M.ª D. Jiménez López (coord.), Sintaxis del griego antiguo, Vol. 2, Madrid, CSIC: 637-678.
REVUELTA PUIGDOLLERS, Antonio (2022b), «Los adverbios, partículas e interjecciones: de la oración al discurso», en M.ª D. Jiménez López (coord.), Sintaxis del griego antiguo, Vol. 1, Madrid, CSIC: 491-555.
RODRÍGUEZ PIEDRABUENA, Sandra (2021), «Preguntas indirectas ecoicas en griego clásico», Euphrosyne 49: 77-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.128796. Extraído de https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.128796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.128796
ROUSSOU, Anna, VLACHOS, Christos & PAPAZACHARIOU, Dimitris (2014), «In Situ, Ex Situ and (Non) Echo Questions», en N. Lavidas, Th. Alexiou & A.M. Sougari (eds.), Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistcs 1, Berlin, De Gruyter: 475-494. https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560762.p317. Extraído de https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2478/9788376560762.p317/html
SACKS, Harvey (1992), Lectures on Conversation, Orlando (Florida), Blackwell.
SACKS, Harvey, SCHEGLOFF, Emanuel & JEFFERSON, Gail (1974), «A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking in Conversation», Language 50: 696-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
SCHWYZER, Eduard & DEBRUNNER, Albert (1950), Griechische Grammatik: auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik. II: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik, Frankfurt, Beck [5.ª reimpr. 1988].
SINOPOULOU, Ourania (2008), «Multiple questions and apparent wh-in situ: evidence from Greek», Proceedings of ConSOLE, XV: 223–246. Extraído de https://www.academia.edu/7582558/Multiple_questions_and_apparent_whin_situ_evidence_from_Greek
SMYTH, Herbert Weir (1920), A Greek grammar for colleges, Nueva York, American Book Company.
SPERBER, Dan & WILSON, Deindre (1986), Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell.
SPERBER, Dan & WILSON, Deindre (1990), «Rhetoric and relevance», en D. Wllbery & J. Bender (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice, Redwood City (California), Stanford University Press: 140-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621848-009
SPERBER, Dan & WILSON, Deindre (2002), «Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading», Mind & Language 17(1-2): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186
SPERBER, Dan (1994), «Understanding verbal understanding», en J. Khalfa (ed.), What is Intelligence?, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 179-198.
STALNAKER, R. (1972), «Pragmatics», en D. Davidson & G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht, Reidel: 380-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_11
STALNAKER, R. (1973), «Presuppositions», Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262951
STALNAKER, R. (1974), «Pragmatic presuppositions», en M. Munitz & P. Unger (eds.), Sematics and Philosophy, Nueva York, NYU Press: 197, 213.
STEVENS, Peter T. (1937), «Colloquial expressions in Euripides», Classical Quarterly 31(3-4): 182-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800020590
STEVENS, Peter T. (1976), Colloquial expressions in Euripides, Wiesbaden, Franz Steiner.
SUÁREZ-MARTÍNEZ, Pedro (2017), «Regradación e insubordinación en latín», Latomus 76(3): 748-764.
TANAKA, H. (2011), «Syntactic identity and ellipsis», The Linguistic Review 28: 79-110. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.003
THOMASON, R. (1990), «Accomodation, meaning and implicature: interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics», en P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan & M.E. Pollock (eds.), Intentions in Communication, Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press: 325-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0018
TSUI, Amy B.M. (1994), English Conversation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
VAN CRAENENBROECK, J. (2010), The syntax of ellipsis: evidence from Dutch dialects, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375640.001.0001
VAN EMDE BOAS, Evert, RIJKSBARON, Albert, HUITINK, Luuk & DE BAKKER, Mathieu (2019), The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek, Cambridge, Cambridge Univeristy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139027052
YOUNGDONG, Cho (2024), The Syntax and Semantics of Fragments in English Echo Questions, [Tesis Doctoral], Universidad Nacional de Seúl
Format
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.





