The Scholastic Sources of William Prynne. Theology and Politics of a Seventeenth-Century English Puritan.

Keywords: Mariana, Suárez, Bracton, Fortescue, Prynne, Absolutism, Spanish Scholasticism, Parlamentarism, “doctors of Salamancha”
Agencies: Este trabajo ha sido realizado en el marco del Proyecto de investigación “Salvación, política y economía. El comercio de ideas entre España y Gran Bretaña en los siglos XVII y XVIII” (Programa de generación de conocimiento 2021, referencia: PID2021-122994NB-I00), financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, la Agencia Española de Investigación (AEI) y el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), del que el autor es el IP primero. El autor agradece a los revisores sus observaciones y comentarios, que han contribuido a la mejora de este artículo.

Abstract

This article aims to investigate the exchange of ideas between William Prynne and the Hispanic scholastic tradition, especially in relation to the origin and limits of the king's power as essentially subordinate to Parliament. Prynne's Calvinist theology, strongly opposed to Catholic and Arminian-Anglican theology, is also considered at the beginning of the work. The work ends by concluding that in Prynne’s thought there is, along with a radical theological opposition to Arminians and Catholics, an intense reception of the political ideas of Salamonio, the schoolmen and the doctors of Salamancha, such as Mariana, Suárez, etc., largely coinciding with the sources of medieval English political law, such as Bracton, Fleta and Fortescue. From a methodological point of view, the article has been elaborated from an intense work of Prynne's theological and political primary sources, accessible thanks to the EEBO (Early English Books Online) database of the University of Michigan.

View Citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2022-10-27
How to Cite
Prieto López, L. (2022). The Scholastic Sources of William Prynne. Theology and Politics of a Seventeenth-Century English Puritan. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 39(3), 691-709. https://doi.org/10.5209/ashf.81022