Engaño generalizado, pragmática y argumentación

Cristián Santibáñez Yáñez

Resumen


Este trabajo procura aportar distinciones conceptuales de la familia de comportamientos lingüísticos y psicológicos compuesta por el autoengaño, el engaño, la mentira y la manipulación, que se han agrupado aquí bajo la rúbrica de engaño generalizado. Estas distinciones permitirán luego analizar pragmática y argumentativamente los intentos por justificar y convencer a una audiencia de un agente que utiliza tales conductas. Para lograr tanto las distinciones conceptuales como el análisis de los casos escogidos, se discuten acercamientos provenientes de la literatura en cognición, teoría evolutiva, pragmática y teoría argumentativa. Específicamente, estas herramientas teóricas y analíticas se aplican a dos casos en los que el sesgo de influencia social moviliza una conducta argumentativa en la que se observa uno o varios de los miembros de la familia del engaño generalizado. Los resultados muestran que dentro de tal contexto, el agente da justificaciones que muestran auto-engaño y engaños, y trata de convencer a través de argumentos irrelevantes e insuficientes que van configurando un escenario manipulativo.

Citas


Akerlof, George y Robert Shiller, 2015: Phishing for Phools. The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.

Armitage, Christopher y otros, 2008: “Self-affirmation increases acceptance of health-risk information among UK adult smokers with low socioeconomic status”, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 88–95.

Asch, Solomon, 1951: “Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments”, en Harold Guetzkow (Ed.): Groups, leadership and men, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press, 177-190.

Asch, Solomon, 1955: “Opinions and social pressure’, Scientific American, 193 (5), 31-35.

Asch, Solomon, 1956: “Studies of independence and conformity. A minority of one against a unanimous majority”, Psychological Monographs, 70 (9), 1-70.

Austin, Elizabeth. y otros, 2007: “Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?”, Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 179–189.

Bagozzi, Richard y otros, 2013: “Theory of mind and empathic explanations of Machiavellianism: A neuroscience perspective”, Journal of Management, 39 , 1760–1798.

Bereczkei, Tamás, 2015: “The manipulative skill: Cognitive devices and their neural correlates underlying Machiavellian’s decision making”, Brain and Cognition, 99: 24–31.

Bereczkei, Tamás y Bela Birkas, 2014: “The Insightful Manipulator: Machiavellians’ Interpersonal Tactics May Be Linked to Their Superior Information Processing Skills”, International Journal of Psychological Studies, 6 (4), 65-70.

Blass, Regina, 2005: “Manipulation in the speeches and writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a relevance theoretic point of view”, en Louis de Saussure y Peter Schulz (eds.): Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 169-190.

Carver, Charles y Michael Scheier, 2002: “Optimism’, en Charles Snyder y Shane Lopez (eds.): Handbook of positive psychology, New York: Oxford University Press, 231-243.

Cheney, Dorothy y Robert Seyfarth, 1990: How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chilton, Paul, 2005: “Manipulation, memes and metaphors: the case of Mein Kamp”, en Louis de Saussure y Peter Schulz (eds.): Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 15-43.

D’Agostini, Franca, 2014: Mentira, Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo Editora.

DePaulo, Bella y Dorothy Kashy, 1998: “Everyday lies in close and casual relationships”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79.

Dijk, Teun van, 1994: “Discourse and inequality”, Lenguas Modernas, 21, 19-37.

Dijk, Teun van, 2005: “War rhetoric of a little ally. Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq”, Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 65–91.

Dijk, Teun van, 2006: “Discourse and manipulation”, Discourse & Society, 17(2), 359-383.

Ditto, Peter y David Lopez, 1992: “Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decisión criteria for preferred and non-preferred conclusions”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–84.

Evans, Jonathan, 2009: “How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?”, en Jonathan Evans y Keith Frankish (eds.): In Two Minds. Dual Processes and Beyond, New York: Oxford University Press, 33-54.

Evans, Jonathan, 2010: Thinking Twice. Two Minds in One Brain, New York: Oxford University Press.

Evans, Jonathan, 2011: “Reasoning is for thinking, not just for arguing”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34 (2), 77-78.

Evans, Jonathan y Keith Stanovich, 2013: “Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.

Frankish, Keith, 2009: “Systems and levels: Dual-system theories and the personalsubpersonal distinction”, en Jonathan Evans y Keith Frankish (eds.): In Two Minds. Dual Processes and Beyond, New York: Oxford University Press, 89-108.

Galasinski, Dariusz, 2000: The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study, London: Sage.

Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2008: Rationality for Mortals. How People cope with Uncertainty, New York: Oxford University Press.

Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2010: “Moral satisficing: Rethinking moral behavior as bounded”, Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 528-554.

Hample, Dale, 1980: “Purposes and effects of lying”, Southern Speech Communication Journal, 46 (1), 33-47.

Hawley, Patricia, 2006: “Evolution and personality: A new look at Machiavellianism”, rn: Daniel Mroczek y Todd Little (eds.): Handbook of personality development, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 147-161.

von Hippel, William y Robert Trivers. (2011). The evolution and psychology of selfdeception. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 34,1-56.

Kurzban, Robert, 2012:. Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Levine, Timothy, Rachel Kim y Lauren Hamel, 2010: “People Lie for a Reason: Three Experiments Documenting the Principle of Veracity”, Communication Research Reports, 27 (4), 271- 285.

Littlefield, Scott, 2013: “Security, independence, and sustainability: Imprecise language and the manipulation of energy policy in the United States”, Energy Policy, 52, 779-788.

Lorenzo, Guillermo, 2008: “Mentes que mienten. Reflexiones sobre los orígenes evolutivos

de la prevaricación”, en Leonarda Trapasi y José Martos (eds.): Los recursos de la

mentira: lenguaje y textos, Barcelona: Anthropos, 25-42.

Lyons, Minna y otros, 2010: “Mind-reading and manipulation –Is Machiavellianism

related to theory of mind?”, Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 8 (3), 261–274.

Maillat, Didier y Steve Oswald, 2009: “Defining manipulative discourse: the pragmatics of cognitive illusions”, International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 348-370.

Maillat, Didier y Steve Oswald, 2011: “Constraining context: a pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation”, en Christopher Hart (Ed.): Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65-80.

McCornack, Steven y otros, 2014: “Information Manipulation Theory 2: A Propositional Theory of Deceptive Discourse Production”, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 348-377.

Mehmet, Ali y otros, 2015: “Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: An argumentative analysis”, Discourse Studies, 17 (4), 467-484.

Oswald, Steve, 2014): “It Is Easy to Miss Something You Are Not Looking For. A Pragmatic Account of Covert Communicative Influence for (Critical) Discourse Analysis”, en Christopher Hart y Piotr Cap (eds.): Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Bloomsbury, 97-120.

Penrod, Steve y Brian Cutler, 1995: “Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation”, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 817– 845.

Ramachandran, Vilayanur, 2009: “Self-awareness: The last frontier”, [http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rama08/rama08_index.html, fecha de consulta: 23 agosto de 2016].

Rochat, Philippe, 2014: Origins of Possession. Owning and sharing in Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

de Saussure, Louis, 2005: “Manipulation and cognitive pragmatics: Preliminary hypotheses”, en Louis de Saussure y Peter Schulz (eds.): Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 113-146.

Searle, John, 2001: Rationality in Action, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca, 1995: “‘But’ as an indicator of counter-arguments and concessions”, Leuvense Bijdragen, 84: 281–294.

Solberg Nes, Lise y Suzanne Segerstrom, 2006: “Dispositional optimism and coping: A meta-analytic review”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 235-251.

Sperber, Dan y Deirdre Wilson, 1995: Relevance. Communication & Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Sperber, Dan y otros, 2010: “Epistemic Vigilance”, Mind & Language, 25 (4), 359–393.

Sterelny, Kim, 2012: The Evolved Apprentice. How Evolution Made Humans Unique, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Sunstein, Cass, 2014: On Rumor, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sunstein, Cass y Reid Hastie, 2015: Wiser. Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Review Press.

Taylor, Shelley, 1989: Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind, London: Basic Books.

Trivers, Robert, 2011: Deceit and Self-deception. Fooling yourself the better to fool others. London: Allen Lane.

Williams, Bernard, 2002: Verdad y veracidad. Un ensayo genealógico, Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.

Wilson, David, David Near y Ralph Miller, 1996: “Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures”, Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 285–299.

Zarnoth, Paul y Janet Sniezek, 1997: “The social influence of confidence in group decisión making”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 345-366.


Texto completo: PDF

Refbacks

  • No hay Refbacks actualmente.



Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación.
ISSN electrónico 1576-4737

© . Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Biblioteca Complutense | Ediciones Complutense